Abstract
While the use of thromboelastometry analysis (ROTEM (R)) in evaluation of haemostasis is rapidly increasing, important validity parameters of testing remain inadequately examined. We aimed to study systematically the consistency of thromboelastometry parameters within individual tests regarding measurements between different analysers, between different channels of the same analyser, between morning and afternoon measurements (circadian variation), and if measured four weeks apart. Citrated whole blood samples from 40 healthy volunteers were analysed with two analysers in parallel. EXTEM, INTEM, FIBTEM, HEPTEM and APTEM tests were conducted. A Bland-Altman comparison was performed and homogeneity of variances was tested using the pitman test. P-value ranges were used to classify the level of homogeneity (p0.5 high homogeneity). Less than half of all comparisons made showed high homogeneity of variances (p>0.5) and in about a fifth of comparisons data distributions were heterogeneous (p
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1161-1166 |
Journal | Thrombosis and Haemostasis |
Volume | 111 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2014 |
Keywords
- Thromboelastometry
- reliability
- reproducibility