Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Consensus definition of stage III non-small-cell lung cancer technical resectability to standardise inclusion criteria for clinical trials: a multisocietal EORTC-Lung Cancer Group collaboration

  • Anne Marie C. Dingemans*
  • , Isabelle Opitz
  • , Alessandro Brunelli
  • , Jordi Remon
  • , Lizza E.L. Hendriks
  • , John Edwards
  • , Corinne Faivre-Finn
  • , Noemi Reguart
  • , Egbert F. Smit
  • , Antonin Levy
  • , David Sanchez-Lorente
  • , Juan Carlos Trujillo
  • , Andrea R. Filippi
  • , Konstantinos Stathopoulos
  • , Torsten G. Blum
  • , Matthias Guckenberger
  • , Sanjay Popat
  • , Riccardo De Angelis
  • , Paul Hofman
  • , Jan von der Thüsen
  • Koen J. Hartemink, René H. Petersen, Enrico Ruffini, Chris Dickhoff, Ilias Houda, Elena Prisciandaro, Dirk De Ruysscher, Jules Derks, Idris Bahce, Alessio Mariolo, Benjamin Besse, Eleni Xenophontos, Niccolo Giaj Levra, Paul van Schil, Mariana Brandão, Thierry Berghmans
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review articlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The decision regarding resectability in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is complex. To improve consistency in eligibility criteria in clinical trials, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) initiated a Delphi study to establish a standardised definition of technical resectability for stage III NSCLC. 36 experts from the EORTC, European Respiratory Society, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, European Thoracic Oncology Platform and International Breast Cancer Study Group, European Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and European Society of Pathology formulated 34 consensus statements on the definition of resectability. Consensus was defined as 75% agreement. After three Delphi rounds there was unanimous consensus that the decision on resectability should be made by experienced thoracic surgeons within the context of a multidisciplinary team. Initial assessments should include PET–CT, brain MRI, and invasive mediastinal staging. Stage IIIA was generally classified as resectable. Tumours with N2 involvement might be resectable depending on the nature of lymph node involvement (ie, single or multi-station, bulky or non-bulky, and invasive or non-invasive). Stage IIIB might be considered resectable, depending on lymph node characteristics: N2<inf>single</inf> mostly resectable; N2<inf>multi</inf> mostly unresectable; N2<inf>bulky</inf> mostly unresectable; and N2<inf>invasive</inf> or N3 unresectable. Stage IIIC was classified as unresectable. The proposed definitions aim to standardise inclusion criteria for clinical trials facilitating a more consistent evaluation of multimodal treatments for stage III NSCLC. Further data collection, especially on the nature of N2 disease, is needed to refine the definition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)453-462
Number of pages10
JournalThe Lancet Respiratory medicine
Volume14
Issue number5
Early online date1 Jan 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consensus definition of stage III non-small-cell lung cancer technical resectability to standardise inclusion criteria for clinical trials: a multisocietal EORTC-Lung Cancer Group collaboration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this