Conscience reconsidered: The moral work of navigating participation in abortion care on labor and delivery

Danielle Czarnecki*, Renee R. Anspach, Raymond G. De Vries, Mercedez D. Dunn, Katrina Hauschildt, Lisa H. Harris

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

How do caregivers make decisions about participating in morally contested care, such as abortion? Debates about conscience in the delivery of health care generally assume that participation decisions stem from religious beliefs and moral values. Few studies have examined this question in the context of everyday practice. Drawing on 50 interviews with the staff of a labor and delivery unit offering abortion care including nurses, maternal fetal medicine specialists, obstetrics and gynecology residents, and anesthesiologists we show that respondents have varied definitions of "participation" in abortion care and that participation decisions are driven by an array of factors beyond personal beliefs. We present a conceptual model of "moral work" that shows conscience to be an emerging, iterative process influenced not only by beliefs religious and non-religious but also by personal and work experiences and social and institutional contexts. Our study brings new insights into understanding conscience and participation in contested care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)181-189
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Science & Medicine
Volume232
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

Keywords

  • USA
  • Abortion
  • Conscience
  • Moral work
  • Care moments
  • Qualitative research
  • Decision-making
  • Bioethics
  • Sociology
  • DECISION-MAKING
  • OBJECTION
  • PHYSICIANS
  • PHARMACISTS
  • WILLINGNESS
  • ETHICS
  • NURSES

Cite this