Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

CONFIDENT-HFpEF: a machine learning-based risk stratification for mortality and hospitalization using multimodal real-world data

  • Marat Fudim*
  • , Vanessa Van Empel
  • , Tobias Zehnder
  • , Benoit Sauty
  • , Christian Esposito
  • , Félix Balazard
  • , Imke Mayer
  • , Mohammad Hallal
  • , Nicolas Loiseau
  • , Jerremy Weerts
  • , Manesh Patel
  • , Suresh Balu
  • , Bradley Hintze
  • , Francisco Torres
  • , Mariann Micsinai
  • , Marzia Rigolli
  • , Paul Kessler
  • , Maxime Touzot
  • , Lars H Lund
  • , Aruna Pradhan
  • Javed Butler
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous condition with high morbidity and mortality. Accurate risk stratification is important for advancing drug development and improving clinical care. Methods: CONFIDENT is an observational, multi-cohort study across three centres in Europe and the USA. Patients with HFpEF, according to the HFA-PEFF criteria, with ≥ 2 years of follow-up, were included from 2013 to 2022. Data include electronic health records, lab tests, echocardiography, and electrocardiography. We developed machine learning-based prognostic models to predict all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Model performance was compared to the validated risk score and validated in an external cohort. Results: A total of 1208 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 72 ± 12, and the mean body mass index was 32 ± 9 kg/m 2. The 2-year risk of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality ranged from 13 to 44% and 9 to 19%, respectively. The all-cause mortality prognostic model achieved fair discrimination with a C-index of 0.68 [95% CI 0.62–0.74], and 0.71 [95% CI 0.64–0.78] in the training cohorts, and a good discrimination of 0.72 [95% CI 0.65–0.78] in the validation cohort but performed better than the PREDICT-HFpEF score (C-index: 0.66 [95% CI 0.54–0.72], P-value = .006; 0.65, [95% CI 0.55–0.72], P-value < .001 and 0.67 [95% CI 0.59–0.73], P-value = .036, respectively). Similar results were observed when compared to the Meta-Analysis Global Group In Chronic Heart Failure Risk Score (MAGGIC). The HF hospitalization model also outperformed both comparators, including MAGGIC+ natriuretic peptide. Conclusion: CONFIDENT prognostic models for all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization using routinely collected variables can reliably predict outcomes and potentially facilitate personalized care and trial recruitment strategies in HFpEF.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberxvag097
JournalEsc heart failure
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2026

Keywords

  • HFpEF
  • Heart failure
  • Machine learning
  • Mortality
  • Real-world data
  • Risk stratification
  • Humans
  • Machine Learning
  • Heart Failure/mortality physiopathology diagnosis
  • Hospitalization/trends statistics & numerical data
  • Risk Assessment/methods
  • Prognosis
  • Female
  • Stroke Volume/physiology
  • Male
  • Aged
  • Europe/epidemiology
  • Survival Rate/trends
  • Cause of Death/trends
  • United States/epidemiology
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Predictive Learning Models

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CONFIDENT-HFpEF: a machine learning-based risk stratification for mortality and hospitalization using multimodal real-world data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this