Conceptual model for the health technology assessment of current and novel interventions in rheumatoid arthritis

Evo Alemao*, Maiwenn J. Al, Annelies A. Boonen, Matthew D. Stevenson, Suzanne M. M. Verstappen, Kaleb Michaud, Michael E. Weinblatt, Maureen P. M. H. Rutten-van Molken

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate current approaches to economic modeling in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and propose a new conceptual model for evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of RA interventions. We followed recommendations from the International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research-Society of Medical Decision Making (ISPOR-SMDM) Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-2. The process involved scoping the decision problem by a working group and drafting a preliminary cost-effectiveness model framework. A systematic literature review (SLR) of existing decision-analytic models was performed and analysis of an RA registry was conducted to inform the structure of the draft conceptual model. Finally, an expert panel was convened to seek input on the draft conceptual model. The proposed conceptual model consists of three separate modules: 1) patient characteristic module, 2) treatment module, and 3) outcome module. Consistent with the scope, the conceptual model proposed six changes to current economic models in RA. These changes proposed are to: 1) use composite measures of disease activity to evaluate treatment response as well as disease progression (at least two measures should be considered, one as the base case and one as a sensitivity analysis); 2) conduct utility mapping based on disease activity measures; 3) incorporate subgroups based on guideline-recommended prognostic factors; 4) integrate realistic treatment patterns based on clinical practice/registry datasets; 5) assimilate outcomes that are not joint related (extra-articular outcomes); and 6) assess mortality based on disease activity. We proposed a conceptual model that incorporates the current understanding of clinical and real-world evidence in RA, as well as of existing modeling assumptions. The proposed model framework was reviewed with experts and could serve as a foundation for developing future cost-effectiveness models in RA.
Original languageEnglish
Article number0205013
Number of pages18
JournalPLOS ONE
Volume13
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • COLLEGE-OF-RHEUMATOLOGY
  • RAPID RADIOGRAPHIC PROGRESSION
  • MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS
  • COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
  • DISEASE-ACTIVITY
  • AMERICAN-COLLEGE
  • TREATMENT STRATEGIES
  • EXTRAARTICULAR MANIFESTATIONS
  • METHOTREXATE MONOTHERAPY
  • SERIOUS INFECTIONS

Cite this