Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Computed Tomography Colonography in Fecal Immunochemical Test Positives in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program

  • Sarah Moen
  • , Fleur E Marijnissen
  • , Jochim S Terhaar Sive Droste
  • , Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel
  • , B W Marcel Spanier
  • , Jelle F Huisman
  • , Evelien Dekker
  • , Jaap Stoker
  • , Ernst J Kuipers
  • , Maarten G J Thomeer
  • , Manon C W Spaander*
  • , Leonieke M M Wolters
  • , Ivonne Leeuwenburgh
  • , Merel M Tielemans
  • , Xander G Vos
  • , Mariette C A van Kouwen
  • , Marjon Kerkhof
  • , Ruud W M Schrauwen
  • , Renzo P Veenstra
  • , Lisette G Capelle
  • Marloes Bigirwamungu-Bargeman, Caroline A Wientjes, Conny van Enckevort, Sanna A Mulder, Djuna L Cahen, Tom C Seerden, Lennard P L Gilissen, Robbert Eichhorn, Paul Bus, Rogier J J de Ridder, Erik H C J Buster, Annick B van Nunen, CT in BVO Study Group
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background & Aims In the Dutch colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program, fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positives are offered computed tomography colonography (CTC) instead of colonoscopy in case of comorbidities or patient refusal. Literature on CTC in FIT-positives is scarce, and the risk of post-CT interval CRC (PCT-CRC) in this population is unknown. Methods In this cohort study, we assessed CTC yield, clinical management, and risk of PCT-CRC in FIT-positives who underwent CTC between 2014 and 2019 in the Dutch CRC screening program. Data were linked with the National Cancer Registry to identify PCT-CRCs. Results Of 4506 FIT-positives scheduled for CTC (1.32% of all FIT-positives), 2794 (62%) underwent CTC (median age, 69 years; 58.8% male, 72.2% due to comorbidities). CRC was detected in 160 (5.7%), polyps ≥10 mm in 554 (19.8%), and polyps 6 to 9 mm in 512 (18.3%). A total of 1047 additional endoscopies (37.5%) were indicated for polyps ≥6 mm or CRC. A total of 987 additional endoscopies (35.3%) were performed. Histologically confirmed advanced neoplasia (AN) was present in 590 (21.1%), CRC in 112 (4.0%), and advanced adenomas in 502 (18.0%). Sixteen PCT-CRCs (0.6%) occurred during a median follow-up of 49 months (interquartile range, 36–64 months). Quality reporting was often lacking, and 5 complications (0.2%) occurred. Conclusions CTC in FIT-positive screenees was associated with a lower AN detection rate and a higher PCT-CRC rate compared with what is known from colonoscopy. A substantial proportion of complications occurred, and quality reporting was often lacking. This underlines the need for a structured quality assurance program for CTCs performed in FIT-positives. Critical appraisal of who to refer for CTC and communication about the benefits and pitfalls of CTC are warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2616-2624.e3
JournalClinical gastroenterology and hepatology
Volume23
Issue number13
Early online date7 May 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • CT-colonography
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening
  • Fecal Immunochemical Test
  • Post-CT Interval Colorectal Cancer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Computed Tomography Colonography in Fecal Immunochemical Test Positives in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this