COMPRES: a prospective postmarketing evaluation of the compression anastomosis ring CAR 27/ColonRing

A. D'Hoore; M. R. Albert; S. M. Cohen; F. Herbst; I. Matter; K. Van der Speeten; J. Dominguez; H. Rutten; J. P. Muldoon; O. Bardakcioglu; A. J. Senagore; R. Ruppert; S. Mills; M. J. Stamos; L. Pahlman; E. Choman; S. D. Wexner

doi:10.1111/codi.12884

COMPRES: a prospective postmarketing evaluation of the compression anastomosis ring CAR 27/ColonRing

A. D'Hoore, M. R. Albert, S. M. Cohen, F. Herbst, I. Matter, K. Van der Speeten, J. Dominguez, H. Rutten, J. P. Muldoon, O. Bardakcioglu, A. J. Senagore, R. Ruppert, S. Mills, M. J. Stamos, L. Pahlman, E. Choman, S. D. Wexner^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Preclinical studies have suggested that nitinol-based compression anastomosis might be a viable solution to anastomotic leak following low anterior resection. A prospective multicentre open label study was therefore designed to evaluate the performance of the ColonRing(?) in (low) colorectal anastomosis.The primary outcome measure was anastomotic leakage. Patients were recruited at 13 different colorectal surgical units in Europe, the United States and Israel. Institutional review board approval was obtained.Between 21 March 2010 and 3 August 2011, 266 patients completed the study protocol. The overall anastomotic leakage rate was 5.3% for all anastomoses, including a rate of 3.1% for low anastomoses. Septic anastomotic complications occurred in 8.3% of all anastomoses and 8.2% of low anastomoses.Nitinol compression anastomosis is safe, effective and easy to use and may offer an advantage for low colorectal anastomosis. A prospective randomized trial comparing ColonRing(?) with conventional stapling is needed.Colorectal Disease ? 2014 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	522-529
Journal	Colorectal Disease
Volume	17
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12884
Publication status	Published - Jun 2015

Keywords

Compression anastomosis
anastomotic leakage
low anterior resection

Access to Document

10.1111/codi.12884

Cite this

D'Hoore, A., Albert, M. R., Cohen, S. M., Herbst, F., Matter, I., Van der Speeten, K., Dominguez, J., Rutten, H., Muldoon, J. P., Bardakcioglu, O., Senagore, A. J., Ruppert, R., Mills, S., Stamos, M. J., Pahlman, L., Choman, E., & Wexner, S. D. (2015). COMPRES: a prospective postmarketing evaluation of the compression anastomosis ring CAR 27/ColonRing. Colorectal Disease, 17(6), 522-529. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12884

@article{a59fbe875db24a3fb5b9189775b56f89,

title = "COMPRES: a prospective postmarketing evaluation of the compression anastomosis ring CAR 27/ColonRing",

abstract = "Preclinical studies have suggested that nitinol-based compression anastomosis might be a viable solution to anastomotic leak following low anterior resection. A prospective multicentre open label study was therefore designed to evaluate the performance of the ColonRing(?) in (low) colorectal anastomosis.The primary outcome measure was anastomotic leakage. Patients were recruited at 13 different colorectal surgical units in Europe, the United States and Israel. Institutional review board approval was obtained.Between 21 March 2010 and 3 August 2011, 266 patients completed the study protocol. The overall anastomotic leakage rate was 5.3% for all anastomoses, including a rate of 3.1% for low anastomoses. Septic anastomotic complications occurred in 8.3% of all anastomoses and 8.2% of low anastomoses.Nitinol compression anastomosis is safe, effective and easy to use and may offer an advantage for low colorectal anastomosis. A prospective randomized trial comparing ColonRing(?) with conventional stapling is needed.Colorectal Disease ? 2014 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.",

keywords = "Compression anastomosis, anastomotic leakage, low anterior resection",

author = "A. D'Hoore and Albert, {M. R.} and Cohen, {S. M.} and F. Herbst and I. Matter and {Van der Speeten}, K. and J. Dominguez and H. Rutten and Muldoon, {J. P.} and O. Bardakcioglu and Senagore, {A. J.} and R. Ruppert and S. Mills and Stamos, {M. J.} and L. Pahlman and E. Choman and Wexner, {S. D.}",

year = "2015",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1111/codi.12884",

language = "English",

volume = "17",

pages = "522--529",

journal = "Colorectal Disease",

issn = "1462-8910",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "6",

}

D'Hoore, A, Albert, MR, Cohen, SM, Herbst, F, Matter, I, Van der Speeten, K, Dominguez, J, Rutten, H, Muldoon, JP, Bardakcioglu, O, Senagore, AJ, Ruppert, R, Mills, S, Stamos, MJ, Pahlman, L, Choman, E & Wexner, SD 2015, 'COMPRES: a prospective postmarketing evaluation of the compression anastomosis ring CAR 27/ColonRing', Colorectal Disease, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 522-529. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12884

TY - JOUR

T1 - COMPRES: a prospective postmarketing evaluation of the compression anastomosis ring CAR 27/ColonRing

AU - D'Hoore, A.

AU - Albert, M. R.

AU - Cohen, S. M.

AU - Herbst, F.

AU - Matter, I.

AU - Van der Speeten, K.

AU - Dominguez, J.

AU - Rutten, H.

AU - Muldoon, J. P.

AU - Bardakcioglu, O.

AU - Senagore, A. J.

AU - Ruppert, R.

AU - Mills, S.

AU - Stamos, M. J.

AU - Pahlman, L.

AU - Choman, E.

AU - Wexner, S. D.

PY - 2015/6

Y1 - 2015/6

N2 - Preclinical studies have suggested that nitinol-based compression anastomosis might be a viable solution to anastomotic leak following low anterior resection. A prospective multicentre open label study was therefore designed to evaluate the performance of the ColonRing(?) in (low) colorectal anastomosis.The primary outcome measure was anastomotic leakage. Patients were recruited at 13 different colorectal surgical units in Europe, the United States and Israel. Institutional review board approval was obtained.Between 21 March 2010 and 3 August 2011, 266 patients completed the study protocol. The overall anastomotic leakage rate was 5.3% for all anastomoses, including a rate of 3.1% for low anastomoses. Septic anastomotic complications occurred in 8.3% of all anastomoses and 8.2% of low anastomoses.Nitinol compression anastomosis is safe, effective and easy to use and may offer an advantage for low colorectal anastomosis. A prospective randomized trial comparing ColonRing(?) with conventional stapling is needed.Colorectal Disease ? 2014 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

AB - Preclinical studies have suggested that nitinol-based compression anastomosis might be a viable solution to anastomotic leak following low anterior resection. A prospective multicentre open label study was therefore designed to evaluate the performance of the ColonRing(?) in (low) colorectal anastomosis.The primary outcome measure was anastomotic leakage. Patients were recruited at 13 different colorectal surgical units in Europe, the United States and Israel. Institutional review board approval was obtained.Between 21 March 2010 and 3 August 2011, 266 patients completed the study protocol. The overall anastomotic leakage rate was 5.3% for all anastomoses, including a rate of 3.1% for low anastomoses. Septic anastomotic complications occurred in 8.3% of all anastomoses and 8.2% of low anastomoses.Nitinol compression anastomosis is safe, effective and easy to use and may offer an advantage for low colorectal anastomosis. A prospective randomized trial comparing ColonRing(?) with conventional stapling is needed.Colorectal Disease ? 2014 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

KW - Compression anastomosis

KW - anastomotic leakage

KW - low anterior resection

U2 - 10.1111/codi.12884

DO - 10.1111/codi.12884

M3 - Article

C2 - 25537083

SN - 1462-8910

VL - 17

SP - 522

EP - 529

JO - Colorectal Disease

JF - Colorectal Disease

IS - 6

ER -

COMPRES: a prospective postmarketing evaluation of the compression anastomosis ring CAR 27/ColonRing

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this