Comparison of Sedentary Estimates between activPAL and Hip- and Wrist-Worn ActiGraph

Annemarie Koster*, Eric J. Shiroma, Paolo Caserotti, Charles E. Matthews, Kong Y. Chen, Nancy W. Glynn, Tamara B. Harris

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Sedentary behavior is an emerging independent health risk factor. The accuracy of measuring sedentary time using accelerometers may depend on the wear location. This study in older adults evaluated the accuracy of various hip-and wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer cutoff points to define sedentary time using the activPAL as the reference method. Methods: Data from 62 adults (mean age, 78.4 yr) of the Aging Research Evaluating Accelerometry study were used. Participants simultaneously wore an activPAL accelerometer on the thigh and ActiGraph accelerometers on the hip, dominant, and nondominant wrist for 7 d in a free-living environment. Using the activPAL as the reference criteria, we compared classification of sedentary time to hip-worn and wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometers over a range of cutoff points for both 60-s and 15-s epochs. Results: The optimal cutoff point for the hip vertical axis was
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1514-1522
JournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Volume48
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2016

Keywords

  • ACCELEROMETRY
  • SITTING
  • SEDENTARY BEHAVIOR
  • VALIDATION STUDIES
  • SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY
  • OLDER ADULTS

Cite this