Comparison of Immediate vs Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients With Synchronous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Sunitinib: The SURTIME Randomized Clinical Trial

Axel Bex*, Peter Mulders, Michael Jewett, John Wagstaff, Johannes V. van Thienen, Christian U. Blank, Roland van Velthoven, Maria del Pilar Laguna, Lori Wood, Harm H. E. van Melick, Maureen J. Aarts, J. B. Lattouf, Thomas Powles, Igle Jan de Jong, Sylvie Rottey, Bertrand Tombal, Sandrine Marreaud, Sandra Collette, Laurence Collette, John Haanen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

IMPORTANCE In clinical practice, patients with primary metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have been offered cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) followed by targeted therapy, but the optimal sequence of surgery and systemic therapy is unknown.

OBJECTIVE To examine whether a period of sunitinib therapy before CN improves outcome compared with immediate CN followed by sunitinib.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized clinical trial began as a phase 3 trial on July 14, 2010, and continued until March 24, 2016, with a median follow-up of 3.3 years and a clinical cutoff date for this report of May 5, 2017. Patients with mRCC of clear cell subtype, resectable primary tumor, and 3 or fewer surgical risk factors were studied.

INTERVENTIONS Immediate CN followed by sunitinib therapy vs treatment with 3 cycles of sunitinib followed by CN in the absence of progression followed by sunitinib therapy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Progression-free survival was the primary end point, which needed a sample size of 458 patients. Because of poor accrual, the independent data monitoring committee endorsed reporting the intention-to-treat 28-week progression-free rate (PFR) instead. Overall survival (OS), adverse events, and postoperative progression were secondary end points.

RESULTS The study closed after 5.7 years with 99 patients (80 men and 19 women; mean [SD] age, 60 [8.5] years). The 28-week PFR was 42% in the immediate CN arm (n = 50) and 43% in the deferred CN arm (n = 49) (P = .61). The intention-to-treat OS hazard ratio of deferred vs immediate CN was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.34-0.95; P = .03), with a median OS of 32.4 months (95% CI, 14.5-65.3 months) in the deferred CN arm and 15.0 months (95% CI, 9.3-29.5 months) in the immediate CN arm. In the deferred CN arm, 48 of 49 patients (98%; 95% CI, 89%-100%) received sunitinib vs 40 of 50 (80%; 95% CI, 67%-89%) in the immediate arm. Systemic progression before planned CN in the deferred CN arm resulted in a per-protocol recommendation against nephrectomy in 14 patients (29%; 95% CI, 18%-43%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Deferred CN did not improve the 28-week PFR. With the deferred approach, more patients received sunitinib and OS results were higher. Pretreatment with sunitinib may identify patients with inherent resistance to systemic therapy before planned CN. This evidence complements recent data from randomized clinical trials to inform treatment decisions in patients with primary clear cell mRCC requiring sunitinib.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)164-170
Number of pages7
JournalJAMA Oncology
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019
EventESMO 2017 Congress - European Society for Medical Oncology - IFEMA - Feria de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Duration: 8 Sept 201712 Sept 2017
https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/event/esmo-2017-congress-european-society-for-medical-oncology

Keywords

  • PLANNED NEPHRECTOMY
  • TARGETED THERAPY
  • RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY
  • INTERFERON-ALPHA
  • CANCER
  • SURVIVAL
  • MORBIDITY
  • MORTALITY
  • RESECTION
  • EFFICACY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Immediate vs Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients With Synchronous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Sunitinib: The SURTIME Randomized Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this