Comparing dual energy CT and subtraction CT on a phantom: which one provides the best contrast in iodine maps for sub-centimetre details?

Evelinda Baerends, Luuk J. Oostveen*, Casper T. Smit, Marco Das, Ioannis Sechopoulos, Monique Brink, Frank de Lange, Mathias Prokop

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5051-5059
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Radiology
Volume28
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Keywords

  • Iodine
  • Phantoms
  • Imaging
  • Contrast Media
  • Tomography
  • X-Ray Computed
  • Subtraction technique
  • COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
  • IMAGE QUALITY
  • MOTION CORRECTION
  • CORONARY CALCIUM
  • ROW CT
  • QUANTIFICATION
  • ANGIOGRAPHY
  • PERFUSION
  • ACCURACY
  • LIVER

Cite this

Baerends, E., Oostveen, L. J., Smit, C. T., Das, M., Sechopoulos, I., Brink, M., de Lange, F., & Prokop, M. (2018). Comparing dual energy CT and subtraction CT on a phantom: which one provides the best contrast in iodine maps for sub-centimetre details? European Radiology, 28(12), 5051-5059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5496-x