Comparative evaluation of autocontouring in clinical practice: A practical method using the Turing test

Mark J. Gooding*, Annamarie J. Smith, Maira Tariq, Paul Aljabar, Devis Peressutti, Judith van der Stoep, Bart Reymen, Daisy Emans, Djoya Hattu, Judith van Loon, Maud de Rooy, Rinus Wanders, Stephanie Peeters, Tim Lustberg, Johan van Soest, Andre Dekker, Wouter van Elmpt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5105-5115
Number of pages11
JournalMedical Physics
Volume45
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2018

Keywords

  • assessment
  • autocontouring
  • editing time
  • organs-at-risk
  • Turing test
  • SEGMENTATION SOFTWARE
  • ATLAS

Cite this

Gooding, M. J., Smith, A. J., Tariq, M., Aljabar, P., Peressutti, D., van der Stoep, J., Reymen, B., Emans, D., Hattu, D., van Loon, J., de Rooy, M., Wanders, R., Peeters, S., Lustberg, T., van Soest, J., Dekker, A., & van Elmpt, W. (2018). Comparative evaluation of autocontouring in clinical practice: A practical method using the Turing test. Medical Physics, 45(11), 5105-5115. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13200