Comparative efficacy of first-line natalizumab vs IFN-beta or glatiramer acetate in relapsing MS

  • Tim Spelman*
  • , Tomas Kalincik
  • , Vilija Jokubaitis
  • , Annie Zhang
  • , Fabio Pellegrini
  • , Heinz Wiendl
  • , Shibeshih Belachew
  • , Robert Hyde
  • , Freek Verheul
  • , Alessandra Lugaresi
  • , Eva Havrdova
  • , Dana Horakova
  • , Pierre Grammond
  • , Pierre Duquette
  • , Alexandre Prat
  • , Gerardo Iuliano
  • , Murat Terzi
  • , Guillermo Izquierdo
  • , Raymond M. M. Hupperts
  • , Cavit Boz
  • Eugenio Pucci, Giorgio Giuliani, Patrizia Sola, Daniele L. A. Spitaleri, Jeannette Lechner-Scott, Roberto Bergamaschi, Francois Grand'Maison, Franco Granella, Ludwig Kappos, Maria Trojano, Helmut Butzkueven
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We compared efficacy and treatment persistence in treatment-naive patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) initiating natalizumab compared with interferon-? (IFN-?)/glatiramer acetate (GA) therapies, using propensity score-matched cohorts from observational multiple sclerosis registries.The study population initiated IFN-?/GA in the MSBase Registry or natalizumab in the Tysabri Observational Program, had ?3 months of on-treatment follow-up, and had active RRMS, defined as ?1 gadolinium-enhancing lesion on cerebral MRI at baseline or ?1 relapse within the 12 months prior to baseline. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were balanced between propensity-matched groups. Annualized relapse rate (ARR), time to first relapse, treatment persistence, and disability outcomes were compared between matched treatment arms in the total population (n = 366/group) and subgroups with higher baseline disease activity.First-line natalizumab was associated with a 68% relative reduction in ARR from a mean (SD) of 0.63 (0.92) on IFN-?/GA to 0.20 (0.63) (p [signed-rank] <0.0001), a 64% reduction in the rate of first relapse (hazard ratio [HR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.47; p <0.001), and a 27% reduction in the rate of discontinuation (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.93; p = 0.01), compared with first-line IFN-?/GA therapy. Confirmed disability progression and area under the Expanded Disability Status Scale-time curve analyses were not significant. Similar relapse and treatment persistence results were observed in each of the higher disease activity subgroups.This study provides Class IV evidence that first-line natalizumab for RRMS improves relapse and treatment persistence outcomes compared to first-line IFN-?/GA. This needs to be balanced against the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in natalizumab-treated patients.This study provides Class IV evidence that first-line natalizumab for RRMS improves relapse rates and treatment persistence outcomes compared to first-line IFN-?/GA.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)102-115
Number of pages14
JournalNeurology: Clinical Practice
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative efficacy of first-line natalizumab vs IFN-beta or glatiramer acetate in relapsing MS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this