Abstract
The knowledge produced by academic scientists has been identified as a potential key driver of technological progress. Recent policies in Europe aim at increasing commercially orientated activities in academe. Based on a sample of German scientists across all fields of science, we investigate the importance of academic patenting. Our findings suggest that academic involvement in patenting results in a citation premium, as academic patents appear to generate more forward citations. We also find that in the European context of changing research objectives and funding sources since the mid-1990s, the "importance" of academic patents declines over time. We show that academic entrants have patents of lower "quality" than academic incumbents but they did not cause the decline, since the relative importance of patents involving academics with an existing patenting history declined over time as well. Moreover, a preliminary evaluation of the effects of the abolishment of the "professor privilege" (the German counterpart of the US Bayh-Dole Act) reveals that this legal disposition led to an acceleration of this apparent decline.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1403-1437 |
Number of pages | 35 |
Journal | Industrial and Corporate Change |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2011 |
Keywords
- BAYH-DOLE ACT
- INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY-RIGHTS
- KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVERS
- UNIVERSITY-RESEARCH
- GERMAN PROFESSORS
- FIRM PERFORMANCE
- SBIR PROGRAM
- IVORY TOWER
- INNOVATION
- CITATIONS