Combining skin conductance and forced choice in the detection of concealed information

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

44 Citations (Scopus)
276 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

An advantage of the concealed information polygraph test (CIT) is that its false positive rate is determined on statistical grounds, and can be set a priori at arbitrary low levels (i.e., few innocents declared guilty). This criterion, however, inevitably leads to a loss of sensitivity (i.e., more guilty suspects declared innocent). We explored whether the sensitivity of a CIT procedure could be increased by adding an independent measure that is based on an entirely different psychological mechanism. In two experiments, we explored whether the accuracy of a CIT procedure could be increased by adding Symptom Validity Testing (SVT), a relatively simple, forced-choice, self-report procedure that has previously been used to detect malingering in various contexts. Results of a feigned amnesia experiment but not from a mock crime experiment showed that a combination measure of both tests yielded better detection than either test alone.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)814-822
JournalPsychophysiology
Volume44
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2007

Cite this