TY - JOUR
T1 - Collective portfolio
T2 - assessment of teaching and learning in health undergraduate courses
AU - da Costa, Glauce Dias
AU - Driessen, Erik
AU - da Silva, Luciana Saraiva
AU - Campos, Aline Aparecida
AU - da Costa, Thiago de Melo
AU - Donateli, Cintia Pereira
AU - Cotta, Rosangela Minardi
PY - 2018/11/1
Y1 - 2018/11/1
N2 - The potential of the reflective collective portfolio as a method of teaching, learning and assessment needs to be emphasized. The objectives is to assess and validate the quality of the collective portfolio as a method of teaching, learning and assessment in the training of health professional. Portfolio quality was analyzed using an inventory of analysis that was adapted and tested for this study. In total, 70 portfolios were analyzed. The Kappa test was used to analyze reproducibility, confirming the level of agreement between the appraisers. Descriptive analysis and the t-test were performed to compare results from the years the portfolios were produced. The constructs (layout and organization, comprehensive, reflective, critical and creative thought) exhibited Cronbach alpha values above 0.7, confirming the high reliability of the tool. The weighted Kappa test revealed an elevated and significant agreement (+90%) between the appraisers. Notably, certain items and constructs exhibited significant differences over the years. All of the constructs were assessed better from 2011 onwards, when the assessment and self-assessment tool was implemented. The success of the portfolio depends on strategies that provide students with greater clarity and forms of developing the method.
AB - The potential of the reflective collective portfolio as a method of teaching, learning and assessment needs to be emphasized. The objectives is to assess and validate the quality of the collective portfolio as a method of teaching, learning and assessment in the training of health professional. Portfolio quality was analyzed using an inventory of analysis that was adapted and tested for this study. In total, 70 portfolios were analyzed. The Kappa test was used to analyze reproducibility, confirming the level of agreement between the appraisers. Descriptive analysis and the t-test were performed to compare results from the years the portfolios were produced. The constructs (layout and organization, comprehensive, reflective, critical and creative thought) exhibited Cronbach alpha values above 0.7, confirming the high reliability of the tool. The weighted Kappa test revealed an elevated and significant agreement (+90%) between the appraisers. Notably, certain items and constructs exhibited significant differences over the years. All of the constructs were assessed better from 2011 onwards, when the assessment and self-assessment tool was implemented. The success of the portfolio depends on strategies that provide students with greater clarity and forms of developing the method.
KW - Evaluation
KW - Health education
KW - Medical education
U2 - 10.1590/1413-812320182311.27072015
DO - 10.1590/1413-812320182311.27072015
M3 - Article
C2 - 30427448
SN - 1413-8123
VL - 23
SP - 3779
EP - 3787
JO - Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
JF - Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
IS - 11
ER -