CNS- and ANS-arousal predict response to antidepressant medication: Findings from the randomized iSPOT-D study

Sebastian Olbrich*, Anja Traenkner, Galina Surova, Richard Gevirtz, Evian Gordon, Ulrich Hegerl, Martijn Arns

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

25 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Arousal systems are one of the recently announced NIMH Research Domain Criteria to inform future diagnostics and treatment prediction. In major depressive disorder (MDD), altered central nervous system (CNS) wakefulness regulation and an increased sympathetic autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity have been identified as biomarkers with possible discriminative value for prediction of antidepressant treatment response. Therefore, the hypothesis of a more pronounced decline of CNS and ANS-arousal being predictive for a positive treatment outcome to selective-serotonin-reuptake-inhibitor (SSRI) treatment was derived from a small, independent exploratory dataset (N = 25) and replicated using data from the randomized international Study to Predict Optimized Treatment Response in Depression (iSPOT-D). There, 1008 MDD participants were randomized to either a SSRI (escitalopram or sertraline) or a serotonin-norepinephrine-reuptake-inhibitor (SNRI-venlafaxine) arm. Treatment response was established after eight weeks using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. CNS-arousal (i.e. electroencephalogram-vigilance), ANS-arousal (heart rate) and their change across time were assessed during rest. Responders and remitters to SSRI treatment were characterized by a faster decline of CNS-arousal during rest whereas SNRI responders showed a significant increase of ANS-arousal. Furthermore, SSRI responders/remitters showed an association between ANS- and CNS-arousal regulation in comparison to non-responders/non-remitters while this was not the case for SNRI treatment arm. Since positive treatment outcome to SSRI and SNRI was linked to distinct CNS and ANS-arousal profiles, these predictive markers probably are not disorder specific alterations but reflect the responsiveness of the nervous system to specific drugs. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)108-115
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Psychiatric Research
Volume73
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • iSPOT-D
  • CNS-arousal
  • EEG-Vigilance
  • Heart rate
  • Antidepressant
  • Major depressive disorder
  • HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY
  • MAJOR DEPRESSION
  • DISCRIMINATIVE POWER
  • EEG-VIGILANCE
  • REM-SLEEP
  • SCHIZOPHRENIA
  • ABNORMALITIES
  • MARKER
  • STATE

Cite this