Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clustering of adherence to personalised dietary recommendations and changes in healthy eating index within the Food4Me study

  • Katherine M. Livingstone
  • , Carlos Celis-Morales
  • , Jose Lara
  • , Clara Woolhead
  • , Clare B. O'Donovan
  • , Hannah Forster
  • , Cyril Marsaux
  • , Anna L. Macready
  • , Rosalind Fallaize
  • , Santiago Navas-Carretero
  • , Rodrigo San-Cristobal
  • , Silvia Kolossa
  • , L. Tsirigoti
  • , Christina P. Lambrinou
  • , George Moschonis
  • , Agnieszka Surwillo
  • , Christian A. Drevon
  • , Yannis Manios
  • , Iwona Traczyk
  • , Eileen R. Gibney
  • Lorraine Brennan, M.C. Walsh, Julie A. Lovegrove, J. Alfredo Martinez, Wim Saris, Hannelore Daniel, M. Gibney, John C Mathers*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Objective: To characterise clusters of individuals based on adherence to dietary recommendations and to determine whether changes in Healthy Eating Index (HEI) scores in response to a personalised nutrition (PN) intervention varied between clusters.

Design: Food4Me study participants were clustered according to whether their baseline dietary intakes met European dietary recommendations. Changes in HEI scores between baseline and month 6 were compared between clusters and stratified by whether individuals received generalised or PN advice.

Setting: Pan-European, Internet-based, 6-month randomised controlled trial.

Subjects: Adults aged 18-79 years (n 1480).

Results: Individuals in cluster 1 (C1) met all recommended intakes except for red meat, those in cluster 2 (C2) met two recommendations, and those in cluster 3 (C3) and cluster 4 (C4) met one recommendation each. C1 had higher intakes of white fish, beans and lentils and low-fat dairy products and lower percentage energy intake from SFA (P <0.05). C2 consumed less chips and pizza and fried foods than C3 and C4 (P <0.05). C1 were lighter, had lower BMI and waist circumference than C3 and were more physically active than C4 (P <0.05). More individuals in C4 were smokers and wanted to lose weight than in C1 (P <0.05). Individuals who received PN advice in C4 reported greater improvements in HEI compared with C3 and C1 (P <0.05).

Conclusions: The cluster where the fewest recommendations were met (C4) reported greater improvements in HEI following a 6-month trial of PN whereas there was no difference between clusters for those randomised to the Control, non-personalised dietary intervention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3296-3305
Number of pages10
JournalPublic Health Nutrition
Volume19
Issue number18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016

Keywords

  • Clustering
  • Personalised nutrition
  • Dietary recommendations
  • Healthy Eating Index
  • RISK-FACTORS
  • LIFE-STYLE
  • PATTERNS
  • ASSOCIATION
  • NUTRITION
  • QUALITY
  • OBESITY
  • TRIAL

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clustering of adherence to personalised dietary recommendations and changes in healthy eating index within the Food4Me study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this