Abstract
IntroductionAmong the elderly, the availability of tool assessing psychosomatic syndromes is limited. The present study aims at testing inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the semi-structured interview for the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR-R-SSI) in the elderly of the general population. MethodOne hundred eight subjects were recruited. Participants received a clinical assessment which included the DCPR-R-SSI, the Illness Attitude Scale (IAS), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the Psychosocial Index (PSI), the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20). Analyses of inter-rater reliability of DCPR-R-SSI and concurrent validity between DCPR-R-SSI and self-administered questionnaires were conducted. ResultsDCPR-R-SSI showed excellent inter-rater reliability with a percent of agreement of 90.7% (K Cohen: 0.856 [SE = 0.043], 95% CI: 0.77-0.94). DCPR-R demoralization showed fair concurrent validity with GDS; concurrent validity was also fair between DCPR-R Alexithymia and TAS-20, and between DCPR-R allostatic overload and PSI allostatic load, while the concurrent validity between DCPR-R Disease Phobia and IAS was moderate. ConclusionDCPR-R-SSI represents a reliable and valid tool to assess psychosomatic syndromes in the elderly. DCPR-R is in need of being implemented in the elderly clinical evaluation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 611-619 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 1 Jan 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2023 |
Keywords
- concurrent validity
- DPCR
- elderly
- inter-rater reliability
- psychosomatic syndromes
- TORONTO-ALEXITHYMIA-SCALE
- HYPOCHONDRIACAL FEARS
- INTERRATER RELIABILITY
- PSYCHIATRIC-DIAGNOSIS
- SOMATOFORM DISORDERS
- CROSS-VALIDATION
- SOMATIC SYMPTOM
- DEPRESSION
- ILLNESS
- DEMORALIZATION