Clinical Presentation, Long-Term Follow-Up, and Outcomes of 1001 Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy Patients and Family Members

Judith A. Groeneweg, Aditya Bhonsale, Cynthia A. James, Anneline S. te Riele, Dennis Dooijes, Crystal Tichnell, Brittney Murray, Ans C. P. Wiesfeld, Abhishek C. Sawant, Bina Kassamali, Douwe E. Atsma, Paul G. Volders, Natasja M. de Groot, Karin de Boer, Stefan L. Zimmerman, Ihab R. Kamel, Jeroen F. van der Heijden, Stuart D. Russell, Maarten Jan Cramer, Ryan J. TedfordPieter A. Doevendans, Toon A. van Veen, Harikrishna Tandri, Arthur A. Wilde, Daniel P. Judge, J. Peter van Tintelen, Richard N. Hauer, Hugh Calkins*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) is a progressive cardiomyopathy. We aimed to define long-term outcome in a transatlantic cohort of 1001 individuals. Methods and Results Clinical and genetic characteristics and follow-up data of ARVD/C index-patients (n=439, fulfilling of 2010 criteria in all) and family members (n=562) were assessed. Mutations were identified in 276 index-patients (63%). Index-patients presented predominantly with sustained ventricular arrhythmias (268; 61%). During a median follow-up of 7 years, 301 of the 416 index-patients presenting alive (72%) experienced sustained ventricular arrhythmias. Sudden cardiac death during follow-up occurred more frequently among index-patients without an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (10/63, 16% versus 2/335, 0.6%). Overall, cardiac mortality and the need for cardiac transplantation were low (6% and 4%, respectively). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were similar in index-patients with and without mutations, as well as in those with familial and nonfamilial ARVD/C. ARVD/C was diagnosed in 207 family members (37%). Symptoms at first evaluation correlated with disease expression. Family members with mutations were more likely to meet Task Force Criteria for ARVD/C (40% versus 18%), experience sustained ventricular arrhythmias (11% versus 1%), and die from a cardiac cause (2% versus 0%) than family members without mutations. Conclusions Long-term outcome was favorable in diagnosed and treated ARVD/C index-patients and family members. Outcome in index-patients was modulated by implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, but not by mutation status and familial background of disease. One third of family members developed ARVD/C. Outcome in family members was determined by symptoms at first evaluation and mutations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)437-446
JournalCirculation : Cardiovascular Genetics
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2015

Keywords

  • arrhythmias
  • cardiac
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia-cardiomyopathy
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia
  • cardiomyopathies
  • genetics

Cite this