Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Maastricht University Home
Support & FAQ
Link opens in a new tab
Search content at Maastricht University
Home
Researchers
Publications
Activities
Press/Media
Prizes
Organisations
Dataset/Software
Projects
Clinical outcomes of automated anastomotic devices: A metanalysis
Linda Renata Micali
, Francesco Matteucci
, Orlando Parise
, Cecilia Tetta
,
Amalia Ioanna Moula
, Monique de Jong
, Francesco Londero
,
Sandro Gelsomino
*
*
Corresponding author for this work
Cardio Thoracic Surgery
Carim - Surgical intervention
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
(Systematic) Review article
›
peer-review
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical outcomes of automated anastomotic devices: A metanalysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
I(2)
100%
Metanalysis
100%
Anastomotic Device
100%
Clinical Outcomes
100%
Egger's Test
100%
Graft Patency
75%
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
75%
Neurological Events
50%
Confidence Interval
25%
Selection Strategy
25%
Cardiovascular Mortality
25%
Low Incidence
25%
Neurological Complications
25%
Cumulative Incidence
25%
Event Rate
25%
Device Use
25%
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
25%
Statistical Index
25%
Overall Rate
25%
INIS
devices
100%
mortality
75%
grafts
75%
patients
25%
reduction
25%
surgery
25%
arteries
25%
coronaries
25%
bypasses
25%
tools
25%
comparative evaluations
25%
reviews
25%
Nursing and Health Professions
Clinical Outcome
100%
Anastomotic Device
100%
Cardiovascular Disease
75%
Graft Patency
75%
Systematic Review
25%
Confidence Interval
25%
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
25%
Neurological Complication
25%
Psychology
Systematic Review
100%