Clinical Introduction of Stem Cell Sparing Radiotherapy to Reduce the Risk of Xerostomia in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer

Maria I. van Rijn-Dekker, Arjen van der Schaaf, Sanne W. Nienhuis, Antoinette S. Arents-Huls, Rachel B. Ger, Olga Hamming-Vrieze, Frank J. P. Hoebers, Mischa de Ridder, Sabrina Vigorito, Ellen M. Zwijnenburg, Johannes A. Langendijk, Peter van Luijk, Roel J. H. M. Steenbakkers*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Studies have shown that dose to the parotid gland stem cell rich (SCR) regions should be reduced to lower the risk of xerostomia after radiotherapy (RT). This study aimed to assess whether stem cell sparing (SCS)-RT can be adopted in routine clinical practice. Methods: Multiple planning studies were performed to compare SCS-RT with standard (ST)-RT using 30 head and neck cancer patients. Shifts in mean dose to the SCR regions (D-mean,D-SCR) and other organs at risk and their estimated impact on normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for side-effects were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A multicenter study was performed (eight institutions, three patients) to test the generalizability of SCS-RT using the Friedman test. Results: Using photons, D-mean,D-SCR was reduced with median 4.1/3.5 Gy for ipsilateral/contralateral (p < 0.001). The largest reductions were when the SCR regions overlapped less with target volumes. Subsequently, NTCPs for xerostomia decreased (p < 0.001). Using protons, D-mean,D-SCR was also reduced (2.2/1.9 Gy for ipsilateral/contralateral, p < 0.002). Nevertheless, SCS-RT did not further decrease NTCPs for xerostomia (p > 0.17). Target coverage and prevention of other side-effects were not compromised. However, increased mean oral cavity dose was observed in some patients. Lastly, in the multicenter study D-mean,D-SCR could be reduced by slightly adjusting the standard optimization. Contralateral D-mean,D-SCR reductions differed between centers (p = 0.01), which was attributed to differences in ST-RT plans. Conclusions: Stem cell sparing radiotherapy can be clinically introduced by making small adjustments to the optimization strategy and can reduce the risk of xerostomia.
Original languageEnglish
Article number4283
Number of pages14
JournalCancers
Volume16
Issue number24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2024

Keywords

  • head and neck cancer
  • xerostomia
  • parotid gland stem cells
  • stem cell sparing radiotherapy
  • MODULATED PROTON THERAPY
  • MODEL-BASED SELECTION
  • RADIATION-THERAPY
  • IMPLEMENTATION
  • DELINEATION
  • PREDICTION

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical Introduction of Stem Cell Sparing Radiotherapy to Reduce the Risk of Xerostomia in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this