Clinical impact of assessing thrombus age using magnetic resonance venography prior to catheter-directed thrombolysis

C.W.K.P. Arnoldussen*, P. Notten, R. Brans, D. Vroegindeweij, L.W. Tick, M.H.W. van de Poel, O.R.M. Wikkeling, L.J. Vleming, A. Koster, K.S.G. Jie, E.M.G. Jacobs, N. Planken, C.H.A. Wittens, H. ten Cate, J.E. Wildberger, A.J. ten Cate-Hoek

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives Magnetic resonance venography (MRV) is underutilized in the evaluation of thrombus properties prior to endovascular treatment but may improve procedural outcomes. We therefore investigated the clinical impact of using a dedicated MRV scoring system to assess thrombus characteristics prior to endovascular intervention for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT).Methods This is a post hoc analysis of data from the CAVA trial (Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT00970619). MRV studies of patients receiving ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for iliofemoral DVT were reviewed. Thrombus agerelated imaging characteristics were scored and translated into an overall score (acute, subacute, or old). MRV scores were compared to patient-reported complaints. MRV-scored groups were compared for CDT duration and success rate.Results Fifty-six patients (29 men; age 50.8 +/- 16.4 years) were included. Using MRV, 27 thrombi were classified acute, 17 subacute, and 12 old. Based on patient-reported complaints, 11 (91.7%) of these old thrombi would have been categorized acute or subacute, and one (3.7%) of the acute thrombi as old. Average duration of CDT to > 90% restored patency differed significantly between groups (p < 0.0001): average duration was 23 h for acute thromboses (range: 19-25), 43 h for subacute (range: 41-62), and 85 h for old thromboses (range: 74-96). CDT was almost eleven times more successful in thromboses characterized as acute and subacute compared to old thromboses (OR: 10.7; 95% CI 2.1-55.5).Conclusion A dedicated MRV scoring system can safely discriminate between acute, subacute, and old thromboses. MRV-based selection is predictive of procedural duration and success rate and can help avoid unnecessary complications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4555-4564
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Radiology
Volume32
Issue number7
Early online date28 Mar 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2022

Keywords

  • Magnetic resonance venography
  • Thrombosis
  • Thrombus
  • Thrombolysis
  • DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS
  • GADOPENTETATE DIMEGLUMINE
  • GADOFOSVESET-TRISODIUM
  • GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE
  • MR-ANGIOGRAPHY
  • MULTICENTER
  • ARTERIES
  • HISTORY
  • CAVENT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical impact of assessing thrombus age using magnetic resonance venography prior to catheter-directed thrombolysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this