Abstract
This article starts with a brief historical account of the ongoing debate about the status of clinical ethics: theory of practice. The author goes on to argue that clinical ethics is best understood as a practice. However, its practicality should not be measured by the extent to which clinical-ethical consultants manage to mediate or negotiate resolutions to ethical conflicts. Rather, clinical ethics is practical because it is characterized by a profound concern for the well-being of individual patients as well as the moral parameters of swift and urgent medical action in the face of limited supportive information.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 295-312 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 1998 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Cultural Diversity
- Decision Making
- Ethical Analysis
- Ethicists
- Ethics Consultation
- Ethics, Clinical
- Ethics, Medical/history
- History, 20th Century
- Humans
- Morals
- Philosophy, Medical
- Professional Practice
- Professional Role
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical ethics: theory or practice?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver