TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical Effectiveness and Implementation Evaluation of a Large-Scale Translation Co-Designed Model on Cardiac Rehabilitation Attendance and Completion in Rural Australia Authors
AU - Beleigoli, A.
AU - Gebremichael, L.
AU - Bulamu, N.
AU - Gulyani, A.
AU - Chew, D.
AU - Nicholls, S.
AU - Ramos, J.
AU - Maher, C.
AU - Beltrame, J.
AU - Kaambwa, B.
AU - Versace, V.
AU - Hendriks, J.
AU - Tavella, R.
AU - Foote, J.
AU - Nesbitt, K.
AU - Powell, S.
AU - Pinero de Plaza, M.
AU - Keech, W.
AU - Ludlow, M.
AU - Maeder, A.
AU - Wanguhu, K.
AU - Meyer, H.
AU - Prichard, I.
AU - Suebkinorn, O.
AU - Zeitz, C.
AU - Brown, A.
AU - Clark, R.
N1 - 10.1016/j.hlc.2024.06.209
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - AimImplementation and utilisation of innovative cardiac rehabilitation (CR) modes of delivery remain low. We aimed to evaluate the Country Heart Attack Prevention (CHAP) model clinical and implementation outcomes in rural Australia.MethodsThe Model for Large-Scale Knowledge Translation guided the CHAP co-design to address low referrals, delivery options, integration with primary care and CR quality. Using a matched prospective cohort design (n=1,913/group), we compared CR attendance/completion (primary outcomes), cardiovascular (CV) re-admissions, mortality, emergency department (ED) visits through mixed effects models and estimated aggregate healthcare costs between CHAP and usual care.ResultsAttendance was similar (24.2% versus 23.8%, p=0.82; OR 1.15, 95%CI 0.89–1.47; p=0.16) and completion was higher in CHAP (77.1% versus 57.5%, p
AB - AimImplementation and utilisation of innovative cardiac rehabilitation (CR) modes of delivery remain low. We aimed to evaluate the Country Heart Attack Prevention (CHAP) model clinical and implementation outcomes in rural Australia.MethodsThe Model for Large-Scale Knowledge Translation guided the CHAP co-design to address low referrals, delivery options, integration with primary care and CR quality. Using a matched prospective cohort design (n=1,913/group), we compared CR attendance/completion (primary outcomes), cardiovascular (CV) re-admissions, mortality, emergency department (ED) visits through mixed effects models and estimated aggregate healthcare costs between CHAP and usual care.ResultsAttendance was similar (24.2% versus 23.8%, p=0.82; OR 1.15, 95%CI 0.89–1.47; p=0.16) and completion was higher in CHAP (77.1% versus 57.5%, p
KW - Clinical Effectiveness Implementation Evaluation Large-Scale Translation Co-Designed Model Cardiac Rehabilitation Attendance and Completion Rural Person-centred referral systems
U2 - 10.1016/j.hlc.2024.06.209
DO - 10.1016/j.hlc.2024.06.209
M3 - Conference Abstract/Poster in journal
SN - 1443-9506
VL - 33
SP - S226-S227
JO - Heart Lung and Circulation
JF - Heart Lung and Circulation
IS - Supplement 4
ER -