TY - CHAP
T1 - City Visitations as Instruments of Urban Network Learning
T2 - The Case of the 2011 Flemish City Visitations
AU - Reynaert, Herwig
AU - Korsten, Arno
AU - Verhelst, Tom
N1 - Funding Information:
The committee concluded its assessment of the visitations by observing that “nearly every regional capital considered the City Fund as an opportunity to exchange knowledge about important social challenges. They wish to receive more support for this exchange and the mutual learning it brings about in the future” (IDEA 2011, p. 18). Despite the cities’ preference to continue the City Fund as a separate financial instrument, however, the Flemish government decided not to continue the City Fund in the following programme period. As of January 1, 2017, the City Fund was integrated into the overarching Municipal Fund as the financial stimuli for regional capitals were merged into the latter’s special financing arrangement for regional capitals. The reason for this merger was the Flemish government’s intention to increase transparency and simplification of its local government finance mechanisms, to reduce the administrative burden on the regional capitals (e.g., in terms of reporting), and to increase local autonomy. Indeed, the new financial arrangements represent a kind of general grant instead of earmarked funding. Together with the abolition of the City Fund, the city visitations also ceased to exist.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - A city visitation is an independent assessment of a city’s performance and the quality of its primary processes, products, and services. It is performed by a temporary, external expert visitation committee, aiming to promote public accountability and learning and improvement. This chapter discusses the city visitations that were made to the Flemish regional capitals in 2011 as instruments of urban network learning. These 2011 city visitations were introduced by the Flemish government to evaluate the policy agreement it had signed with the Flemish regional capitals in order to manage the City Fund, an important element of Flemish urban policy. The visitation procedure involved self-assessment papers and a preparatory meeting with local stakeholders in each city, followed by on-site visits in which the visitation committee met with the city’s political and administrative officers. These visits addressed several topics of urban policy: overall performance and governance, both internally and externally in relation to local stakeholders, civil society, and other government levels; the planned social outcomes and strategic goals laid down in the policy agreements; contemporary social challenges, operationalised by two policy themes of choice; and the value of the City Fund in general. The visitation committee was chaired by academic experts and comprised a group of local government consultants and thematic experts chosen per city. The city visitations proved to be useful instruments to foster urban network learning at three levels. At the micro-level, cities learned about their own internal and external governance through the exchange of views, best practices, and policy recommendations in the visitation reports. At the meso-level, the visitations painted a picture of contemporary urban governance and its challenges in Flanders, whilst the regional capitals learned how to address important policy issues collectively. At the macro-level, finally, the procedure provided valuable insights into the way in which the different government levels interact.
AB - A city visitation is an independent assessment of a city’s performance and the quality of its primary processes, products, and services. It is performed by a temporary, external expert visitation committee, aiming to promote public accountability and learning and improvement. This chapter discusses the city visitations that were made to the Flemish regional capitals in 2011 as instruments of urban network learning. These 2011 city visitations were introduced by the Flemish government to evaluate the policy agreement it had signed with the Flemish regional capitals in order to manage the City Fund, an important element of Flemish urban policy. The visitation procedure involved self-assessment papers and a preparatory meeting with local stakeholders in each city, followed by on-site visits in which the visitation committee met with the city’s political and administrative officers. These visits addressed several topics of urban policy: overall performance and governance, both internally and externally in relation to local stakeholders, civil society, and other government levels; the planned social outcomes and strategic goals laid down in the policy agreements; contemporary social challenges, operationalised by two policy themes of choice; and the value of the City Fund in general. The visitation committee was chaired by academic experts and comprised a group of local government consultants and thematic experts chosen per city. The city visitations proved to be useful instruments to foster urban network learning at three levels. At the micro-level, cities learned about their own internal and external governance through the exchange of views, best practices, and policy recommendations in the visitation reports. At the meso-level, the visitations painted a picture of contemporary urban governance and its challenges in Flanders, whilst the regional capitals learned how to address important policy issues collectively. At the macro-level, finally, the procedure provided valuable insights into the way in which the different government levels interact.
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-36048-1_10
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-36048-1_10
M3 - Chapter
SN - 978-3-030-36047-4
VL - Part F1138
T3 - Palgrave Studies in Sub-National Governance
SP - 199
EP - 232
BT - Strategies for Urban Network Learning
PB - Palgrave Macmillan
CY - Cham
ER -