‘Changing’ One’s Mind: Historical epistemology as normative psychology

Massimiliano Simons*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article argues that historical epistemology offers the history of philosophy and science more than a mere tool to write the history of concepts. It does this, first of all, by rereading historical epistemology through Michel Foucault's "techniques of the self." Second, it turns to the work of Leon Brunschvicg and Gaston Bachelard. In their work we see a proposal for what the subjectivity of scientists and philosophers should be. The article thus argues that their work is driven by a normative psychology: a set of prescriptions for which mental constitution a scholarly self has to have. In the Conclusion, it returns to existing analyses of "open-mindedness" as a virtue and explores in what way these cases challenge these analyses, as well as to what extent Foucault's "techniques of the self" can be applied to other cases in the history of French philosophy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)295-308
Number of pages14
JournalMetaphilosophy
Volume54
Issue number2-3
Early online date27 Feb 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2023

Keywords

  • Gaston Bachelard
  • historical epistemology
  • Leon Brunschvicg
  • Michel Foucault
  • open-mindedness
  • virtue epistemology
  • OPEN-MINDEDNESS
  • VIRTUES

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘Changing’ One’s Mind: Historical epistemology as normative psychology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this