Challenges and Future Directions in Assessing the Quality and Completeness of Advanced Materials Safety Data for Re-Usability: A Position Paper From the Nanosafety Community

  • Veronica I. Dumit*
  • , Irini Furxhi
  • , Penny Nymark
  • , Antreas Afantitis
  • , Ammar Ammar
  • , Monica J. B. Amorim
  • , Dalila Antunes
  • , Svetlana Avramova
  • , Chiara L. Battistelli
  • , Gianpietro Basei
  • , Cecilia Bossa
  • , Emil Cimpan
  • , Mihaela Roxana Cimpan
  • , Dmitri Ciornii
  • , Anna Costa
  • , Camilla Delpivo
  • , Maria Dusinska
  • , Ana Sofia Fonseca
  • , Steffi Friedrichs
  • , Vasile-dan Hodoroaba
  • Danail Hristozov, Panagiotis Isigonis, Nina Jeliazkova, Nikolay Kochev, Eva Kranjc, Dieter Maier, Georgia Melagraki, Anastasios G. Papadiamantis, Tomasz Puzyn, Hubert Rauscher, Katie Reilly, Araceli Sanchez Jimenez, Janeck J. Scott-fordsmand, Neeraj Shandilya, Hyun Kil Shin, Gergana Tancheva, Jeaphianne P. M. van Rijn, Egon L. Willighagen, Ewelina Wyrzykowska, Martine I. Bakker, Damjana Drobne, Thomas E. Exner, Martin Himly, Iseult Lynch*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review articlepeer-review

Abstract

Ensuring data quality, completeness, and interoperability is crucial for progressing safety research, Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design approaches, and regulatory approval of nanoscale and advanced materials. While the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Re-usable) principles aim to promote data re-use, they do not address data quality, essential for data re-use for advancing sustainable and safe innovation. Effective quality assurance procedures require (meta)data to conform to community-agreed standards. Nanosafety data offer a key reference point for developing best practices in data management for advanced materials, as their large-scale generation coincided with the emergence of dedicated data quality criteria and concepts such as FAIR data. This work highlights frameworks, methodologies, and tools that address the challenges associated with the multidisciplinary nature of nanomaterial safety data. Existing approaches to evaluating the reliability, relevance, and completeness of data are considered in light of their potential for integration into harmonized standards and adaptation to advance material requirements. The goal here is to emphasize the importance of automated tools to reduce manual labor in making (meta)data FAIR, enabling trusted data re-use and fostering safer, more sustainable innovation of advanced materials. Awareness and prioritization of these challenges are critical for building robust data infrastructures.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages18
JournalAdvanced Sustainable Systems
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 1 Dec 2025

Keywords

  • advanced materials
  • artificial intelligence
  • data re-usability
  • FAIR principles
  • nanomaterials
  • nanosafety data
  • safe and sustainable by design (SSbD)
  • MINIMUM INFORMATION
  • NANOMATERIAL DATA
  • TOXICITY
  • RELIABILITY
  • RELEVANCE
  • STANDARDS
  • METAANALYSIS
  • ECOTOXICITY
  • UNCERTAINTY
  • EXPRESSION

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Challenges and Future Directions in Assessing the Quality and Completeness of Advanced Materials Safety Data for Re-Usability: A Position Paper From the Nanosafety Community'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this