Behavioural and psychological responses of lower educated smokers to the smoke-free legislation in Dutch hospitality venues: A qualitative study

Sander van der Heiden, Winifred A. Gebhardt*, Marc C. Willemsen, Gera E. Nagelhout, Arie Dijkstra

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

60 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: In 2008, smoke-free legislation was implemented in hospitality venues (HV) in the Netherlands. We investigated how continuing smokers with a lower educational background respond behaviourally and psychologically to the legislation and the norm it communicates. Design: In 2010, 18 lower-educated daily smokers were interviewed. Transcripts were analysed with MAXQDA software. Theories of self-awareness and social in- and exclusion were applied to interpret findings. Results: Smokers had become more self-aware and the experience of a more negative norm surrounding smoking had made them reevaluate their smoking. Smokers had also become more self-aware of their own smoking, both in HV and in general. Feelings of increased social exclusion were reported. Participants dealt with the increased awareness and feelings of social exclusion in different ways depending on their evaluation of the smoking ban, changes in attitude towards own smoking, changes in HV patronage and changes in smoking behaviour. Conclusion: Theories of self-awareness and social in- and exclusion were useful in understanding consequences of a HV smoking ban on continuing smokers. Four different types of responses were identified, i.e. (1) actively trying to quit, (2) socially conscious smoking, (3) feeling victimised and (4) rejecting the norm. Implications for future smoke-free legislation are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-66
JournalPsychology & Health
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • smokers
  • policy impact
  • smoking ban
  • interviews
  • lower socioeconomic status
  • self-awareness
  • social exclusion

Cite this