Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Centre characteristics and procedure-related factors have an impact on outcomes of allogeneic transplantation for patients with CLL: a retrospective analysis from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

  • Johannes Schetelig*
  • , Liesbeth C. de Wreede
  • , Niels S. Andersen
  • , Carol Moreno
  • , Michel van Gelder
  • , Antonin Vitek
  • , Michal Karas
  • , Mauricette Michallet
  • , Maciej Machaczka
  • , Martin Gramatzki
  • , Dietrich Beelen
  • , Jurgen Finke
  • , Julio Delgado
  • , Liisa Volin
  • , Jakob Passweg
  • , Peter Dreger
  • , Nicolaas Schaap
  • , Eva Wagner
  • , Anja Henseler
  • , Anja van Biezen
  • Martin Bornhaeuser, Simona Iacobelli, Hein Putter, Stefan O. Schoenland, Nicolaus Kroger, CLL Subcomm, Chronic Malignancies Working Party
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

The best approach for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantations (alloHCT) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is unknown. We therefore analysed the impact of procedure- and centre-related factors on 5-year event-free survival (EFS) in a large retrospective study. Data of 684 CLL patients who received a first alloHCT between 2000 and 2011 were analysed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards models with a frailty component to investigate unexplained centre heterogeneity. Five-year EFS of the whole cohort was 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34-42%). Larger numbers of CLL alloHCTs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96, P = 0.002), certification of quality management (HR 0.7, P = 0.045) and a higher gross national income per capita (HR 0.4, P = 0.04) improved EFS. In vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) with alemtuzumab compared to no TCD (HR 1.5, P = 0.03), and a female donor compared to a male donor for a male patient (HR 1.4, P = 0.02) had a negative impact on EFS, but not non-myeloablative versus more intensive conditioning. After correcting for patient-, procedure- and centre-characteristics, significant variation in centre outcomes persisted. In conclusion, further research on the impact of centre and procedural characteristics is warranted. Non-myeloablative conditioning appears to be the preferable approach for patients with CLL.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)521-533
Number of pages13
JournalBritish Journal of Haematology
Volume178
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017

Keywords

  • chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
  • allogeneic stem cell transplantation
  • risk factor analysis
  • centre effects
  • frailties
  • CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC-LEUKEMIA
  • STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION
  • QUALITY MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM
  • IBRUTINIB
  • GUIDELINES
  • SURVIVAL
  • ALEMTUZUMAB
  • DIAGNOSIS
  • RESPONSES
  • ABT-199

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Centre characteristics and procedure-related factors have an impact on outcomes of allogeneic transplantation for patients with CLL: a retrospective analysis from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this