Case C-616/17 Blaise and Others: The precautionary principle and its role in judicial review – Glyphosate and the regulatory framework for pesticides

S. Röttger-Wirtz

doi:10.1177/1023263X20949424

Case C-616/17 Blaise and Others: The precautionary principle and its role in judicial review – Glyphosate and the regulatory framework for pesticides

Research output: Contribution to journal › Case note › Professional

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	529–542
Journal	Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Volume	27
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X20949424
Publication status	Published - 2020

Access to Document

10.1177/1023263X20949424Licence: CC BY-NC

Cite this

@article{44d23f669f1e49cb9748695c6f96dfa0,

title = "Case C-616/17 Blaise and Others: The precautionary principle and its role in judicial review – Glyphosate and the regulatory framework for pesticides",

author = "S. R{\"o}ttger-Wirtz",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.1177/1023263X20949424",

language = "English",

volume = "27",

pages = "529–542",

journal = "Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law",

issn = "1023-263X",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Case C-616/17 Blaise and Others: The precautionary principle and its role in judicial review – Glyphosate and the regulatory framework for pesticides

AU - Röttger-Wirtz, S.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

U2 - 10.1177/1023263X20949424

DO - 10.1177/1023263X20949424

M3 - Case note

VL - 27

SP - 529

EP - 542

JO - Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law

JF - Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law

SN - 1023-263X

IS - 4

ER -