Case C-616/17 Blaise and Others: The precautionary principle and its role in judicial review – Glyphosate and the regulatory framework for pesticides

S. Röttger-Wirtz*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalCase noteProfessional

Abstract

The approval renewal of glyphosate as an active substance for pesticides in the EU has also kept the Court of Justice occupied. Within this line of case law, the Blaise case is the most recent one. In this preliminary reference procedure the Court was asked to review the validity of the Plant Protection Products Regulation 1107/2009, examined against the precautionary principle as benchmark. The case is relevant not only for the questions raised about the Regulation, but also as it sheds a light on the – albeit limited – use of the precautionary principle in the judicial review of EU legislative measure.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)529–542
JournalMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Case C-616/17 Blaise and Others: The precautionary principle and its role in judicial review – Glyphosate and the regulatory framework for pesticides'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this