Can implicit measures detect source information in crime-related amnesia?

Ivan Mangiulli, Tiziana Lanciano, Marko Jelicic, Kim van Oorsouw, Fabiana Battista, Antonietta Curci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Participants who are asked to simulate amnesia for a mock crime have a weaker memory for this event when they have to give up their role as a feigner, than those who are not asked to feign memory loss. According to the source monitoring framework (SMF), this memory-undermining effect of simulating amnesia for a crime would be due to misattribution of the right source of information. However, we know that the content of self-generated information (e.g., feigned version of the crime) might be preserved and recognised over time as a result of elaborative cognitive processing. In the present study, we aimed to contrast these two explanations. We showed participants a mock crime video and we instructed them to either feign amnesia (simulators) or confess the mock crime (confessors). Next, a free recall memory test was administered. After one week, participants were asked to perform a personalised source monitoring task using the autobiographical Implicit Association Test (aIAT). As predicted, we found that simulators were able to discriminate the content of their self-generated feigned story of the crime from the original version. Moreover, simulators were quicker than confessors at the aIAT task. Practical and theoretical implications of our results are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1019-1029
Number of pages11
JournalMemory
Volume26
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Cite this

Mangiulli, Ivan ; Lanciano, Tiziana ; Jelicic, Marko ; van Oorsouw, Kim ; Battista, Fabiana ; Curci, Antonietta. / Can implicit measures detect source information in crime-related amnesia?. In: Memory. 2018 ; Vol. 26, No. 8. pp. 1019-1029.
@article{8d6ae72d5cae41069d098d03918c3f2d,
title = "Can implicit measures detect source information in crime-related amnesia?",
abstract = "Participants who are asked to simulate amnesia for a mock crime have a weaker memory for this event when they have to give up their role as a feigner, than those who are not asked to feign memory loss. According to the source monitoring framework (SMF), this memory-undermining effect of simulating amnesia for a crime would be due to misattribution of the right source of information. However, we know that the content of self-generated information (e.g., feigned version of the crime) might be preserved and recognised over time as a result of elaborative cognitive processing. In the present study, we aimed to contrast these two explanations. We showed participants a mock crime video and we instructed them to either feign amnesia (simulators) or confess the mock crime (confessors). Next, a free recall memory test was administered. After one week, participants were asked to perform a personalised source monitoring task using the autobiographical Implicit Association Test (aIAT). As predicted, we found that simulators were able to discriminate the content of their self-generated feigned story of the crime from the original version. Moreover, simulators were quicker than confessors at the aIAT task. Practical and theoretical implications of our results are discussed.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Ivan Mangiulli and Tiziana Lanciano and Marko Jelicic and {van Oorsouw}, Kim and Fabiana Battista and Antonietta Curci",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1080/09658211.2018.1441421",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "1019--1029",
journal = "Memory",
issn = "0965-8211",
publisher = "Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "8",

}

Can implicit measures detect source information in crime-related amnesia? / Mangiulli, Ivan; Lanciano, Tiziana; Jelicic, Marko; van Oorsouw, Kim; Battista, Fabiana; Curci, Antonietta.

In: Memory, Vol. 26, No. 8, 09.2018, p. 1019-1029.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can implicit measures detect source information in crime-related amnesia?

AU - Mangiulli, Ivan

AU - Lanciano, Tiziana

AU - Jelicic, Marko

AU - van Oorsouw, Kim

AU - Battista, Fabiana

AU - Curci, Antonietta

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Participants who are asked to simulate amnesia for a mock crime have a weaker memory for this event when they have to give up their role as a feigner, than those who are not asked to feign memory loss. According to the source monitoring framework (SMF), this memory-undermining effect of simulating amnesia for a crime would be due to misattribution of the right source of information. However, we know that the content of self-generated information (e.g., feigned version of the crime) might be preserved and recognised over time as a result of elaborative cognitive processing. In the present study, we aimed to contrast these two explanations. We showed participants a mock crime video and we instructed them to either feign amnesia (simulators) or confess the mock crime (confessors). Next, a free recall memory test was administered. After one week, participants were asked to perform a personalised source monitoring task using the autobiographical Implicit Association Test (aIAT). As predicted, we found that simulators were able to discriminate the content of their self-generated feigned story of the crime from the original version. Moreover, simulators were quicker than confessors at the aIAT task. Practical and theoretical implications of our results are discussed.

AB - Participants who are asked to simulate amnesia for a mock crime have a weaker memory for this event when they have to give up their role as a feigner, than those who are not asked to feign memory loss. According to the source monitoring framework (SMF), this memory-undermining effect of simulating amnesia for a crime would be due to misattribution of the right source of information. However, we know that the content of self-generated information (e.g., feigned version of the crime) might be preserved and recognised over time as a result of elaborative cognitive processing. In the present study, we aimed to contrast these two explanations. We showed participants a mock crime video and we instructed them to either feign amnesia (simulators) or confess the mock crime (confessors). Next, a free recall memory test was administered. After one week, participants were asked to perform a personalised source monitoring task using the autobiographical Implicit Association Test (aIAT). As predicted, we found that simulators were able to discriminate the content of their self-generated feigned story of the crime from the original version. Moreover, simulators were quicker than confessors at the aIAT task. Practical and theoretical implications of our results are discussed.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1080/09658211.2018.1441421

DO - 10.1080/09658211.2018.1441421

M3 - Article

C2 - 29457541

VL - 26

SP - 1019

EP - 1029

JO - Memory

JF - Memory

SN - 0965-8211

IS - 8

ER -