Quality and clinical generalizability of feasibility outcomes in exercise prehabilitation before colorectal cancer surgery - A systematic review

Anne C M Cuijpers*, Fieke G Linskens*, Bart C Bongers*, Laurents P S Stassen*, Tim Lubbers*, Nico L U van Meeteren*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review article peer-review

Abstract

Suboptimal quality of feasibility assessments might partially explain inconsistencies observed in the effectiveness of exercise prehabilitation before colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. This systematic review aimed to assess the reporting quality and clinical generalizability of feasibility outcomes in feasibility studies addressing exercise prehabilitation before CRC surgery. PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL were searched to identify all feasibility studies focussing on exercise prehabilitation in CRC surgery. Reporting quality was assessed using the Thabane et al. checklist and the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials extension for feasibility studies. Clinical generalizability was evaluated by appraising patient participation in all steps of the study and intervention. Twelve studies were included. The main feasibility outcome in all studies was adherence to the intervention by the study sample. Based on adherence, 10 studies (83%) concluded exercise prehabilitation to be feasible. Six studies (50%) reported all details to assess patient participation showing retention rates between 18.4% and 58.2%, which was caused by non-participation and drop-out. Three feasibility studies (25%) discussed patient-reported barriers to participation and five additional studies (41%) described potential selection bias. Four studies (33%) reported lessons learned to solve issues hampering feasibility and clinical generalizability. Results suggest that true feasibility of exercise prehabilitation before CRC surgery remains questionable due to poor reporting quality, insufficient clarity regarding the representativeness of the study sample for the target population, and limited attention for clinical generalizability. Feasibility of exercise prehabilitation might be improved by offering supervised community- or home-based interventions tailored to the physical and mental abilities of the patient.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1483-1497
Number of pages15
JournalEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume48
Issue number7
Early online date23 Apr 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2022

Keywords

  • Clinical generalizability
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Data quality
  • Feasibility studies
  • PILOT
  • PROGRAM
  • Prehabilitation
  • RECOMMENDATIONS
  • RECTAL-CANCER
  • TRANSLATION
  • TRIALS
  • VALIDATION

Cite this