Burst and Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation Both Activate Spinal GABAergic Mechanisms to Attenuate Pain in a Rat Model of Chronic Neuropathic Pain

Koen P. Meuwissen*, Luuk E. de Vries, Jianwen Wendy Gu, Tianhe C. Zhang, Elbert A. J. Joosten

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

16 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Background Experimental and clinical studies have shown that tonic spinal cord stimulation (SCS) releases gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the spinal dorsal horn. Recently, it was suggested that burst SCS does not act via spinal GABAergic mechanisms. Therefore, we studied spinal GABA release during burst and tonic SCS, both anatomically and pharmacologically, in a well-established chronic neuropathic pain model. Methods Animals underwent partial sciatic nerve ligation (PSNL). Quantitative immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of intracellular GABA levels in the lumbar L4 to L6 dorsal spinal cord was performed after 60 minutes of burst, tonic, or sham SCS in rats that had undergone PSNL (n = 16). In a second pharmacological experiment, the effects of intrathecal administration of the GABA(A) antagonist bicuculline (5 mu g) and the GABA(B) antagonist phaclofen (5 mu g) were assessed. Paw withdrawal thresholds to von Frey filaments of rats that had undergone PSNL (n = 20) were tested during 60 minutes of burst and tonic SCS 30 minutes after intrathecal administration of the drugs. Results Quantitative IHC analysis of GABA immunoreactivity in spinal dorsal horn sections of animals that had received burst SCS (n = 5) showed significantly lower intracellular GABA levels when compared to sham SCS sections (n = 4; P = 0.0201) and tonic SCS sections (n = 7; P = 0.0077). Intrathecal application of the GABA(A) antagonist bicuculline (5 mu g; n = 10) or the GABA(B) antagonist phaclofen (5 mu g; n = 10) resulted in ablation of the analgesic effect for both burst SCS and tonic SCS. Conclusions In conclusion, our anatomical and pharmacological data demonstrate that, in this well-established chronic neuropathic animal model, the analgesic effects of both burst SCS and tonic SCS are mediated via spinal GABAergic mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-87
Number of pages13
JournalPain Practice
Volume20
Issue number1
Early online date9 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

Keywords

  • gamma-aminobutyric acid
  • burst spinal cord stimulation
  • GABAA
  • Breceptor antagonist
  • peripheral nerve injury
  • mechanical hypersensitivity
  • DESIGN ELIMINATING CONFUSION
  • GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC-ACID
  • TOUCH-EVOKED ALLODYNIA
  • DORSAL-HORN
  • FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCES
  • PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY
  • TACTILE ALLODYNIA
  • ANIMAL-MODELS
  • FREQUENCY
  • HYPERSENSITIVITY

Cite this