Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs

  • Mintsje de Boer
  • , Michele van Middelkoop
  • , Michael Hauptmann
  • , Noortje van der Bijl
  • , Jorn A. W. Bosmans
  • , Narda Hendriks-Brouwer
  • , Sijmen J. Schop
  • , Jan Paul de Boer
  • , Nathalie J. Hijmering
  • , Lucy I. H. Overbeek
  • , Marc B. Lobbes
  • , Caroline A. H. Klazen
  • , Daphne de Jong
  • , Hinne A. Rakhorst
  • , Rene R. W. J. van der Hulst
  • , Flora E. van Leeuwen*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Breast implant-related health problems are a subject of fierce debate. Reliable population-based estimates of implant prevalence rates are not available, however, due to a lack of historical registries and incomplete sales data, precluding absolute risk assessments.

Objectives: This study aimed to describe the methodology of a novel procedure to determine Dutch breast implant prevalence based on the evaluation of routine chest radiographs.

Methods: The validity of the new method was first examined in a separate study. Eight reviewers examined a series of 180 chest radiographs with (n = 60) or without (n = 120) a breast implant confirmed by a computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan. After a consensus meeting with best-performing expert reviewers, we reviewed 3000 chest radiographs of women aged 20 to 70 years in 2 large regional hospitals in the Netherlands in 2015. To calculate the national breast implant prevalence, regional prevalence variations were corrected utilizing the National Breast Cancer Screening Program.

Results: Eight reviewers scored with a median sensitivity of 71.7% (range, 41.7%-85.0%) and a median specificity of 94.6% (range, 73.4%-97.5%). After a consensus meeting and a reevaluation by best-performing expert reviewers, sensitivity was 79.9% and specificity was 99.2%. The estimated national prevalence of breast implants among women between 20 and 70 years was 3.0%, ranging from 1.7% at 21 to 30 years to 3.9% between 51 and 60 years.

Conclusions: The novel method in this study was validated with a high sensitivity and specificity, resulting in accurate prevalence estimates and providing the opportunity to conduct absolute risk assessment studies on the health consequences of breast implants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-164
Number of pages9
JournalAesthetic Surgery Journal
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020

Keywords

  • RISK

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this