Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Breast implant illness after reconstruction with silicone breast implants

  • Jonathan Spoor
  • , Marc A M Mureau
  • , Renaud L M Tissier
  • , Juliëtte Hommes
  • , Hinne Rakhorst
  • , Mintsje De Boer
  • , Hester S A Oldenburg
  • , Esther M Heuts
  • , Yvonne L J Vissers
  • , Anneriet E Dassen
  • , Daniel J Evers
  • , Linetta B Koppert
  • , Laura H Zaal
  • , Sabine C Linn
  • , Daphne De Jong
  • , Rene R W J Van Der Hulst
  • , Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters
  • , Eveline M A Bleiker
  • , Flora E Van Leeuwen*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Background "Breast implant illness"(BII) is a constellation of non-specific constitutional, rheumatologic, mental, and cognitive symptoms reported increasingly by women carrying silicone breast implants (SBIs). The impact of BII on the well-being of breast cancer patients with SBI-based breast reconstructions is a subject of debate. Methods In a multicenter cohort of breast cancer survivors (n = 9590) treated between 2000 and 2015 in 6 major regional hospitals in the Netherlands, we performed a health survey (response rate 64.7%). The presence of 18 BII-associated symptoms was compared between patients with and without SBIs in multivariable logistic regression models. In a latent class analysis (LCA), distinct symptom patterns were identified in the study population. Results Median follow-up time was 13.7 (IQR, 6.8) years. Of all SBI-exposed patients (n = 1821), 20.7% reported ≥4 BII-associated symptoms vs 21.2% of non-exposed patients (risk ratio 0.98; 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.09). Joint pain, sicca, sleep impairment, morning stiffness, and shoulder pain were reported most frequently. Patients with SBIs did not have a significantly increased risk of any of the individual BII-associated symptoms. The LCA identified 5 distinct symptom clusters. Patients with SBI-exposure had a lower risk of falling in the most severe symptom cluster (odds ratio 0.64; 95% CI = 0.43 to 0.96). The other symptom clusters were not significantly associated with SBI-exposure. Conclusions Our results indicate that breast cancer survivors with SBI-based reconstructions do not experience more BII-associated symptoms than breast cancer survivors without SBIs, challenging the notion of BII as a distinct clinical entity based on a generic silicone-induced biomechanical pathophysiological mechanism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1717-1728
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the National Cancer Institute
Volume117
Issue number8
Early online date3 Jul 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2025

Keywords

  • Adverse Effects
  • Breast Cancer
  • Breast Implant Illness
  • Breast reconstruction
  • Latent Class Analysis
  • Silicone breast implants

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Breast implant illness after reconstruction with silicone breast implants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this