TY - JOUR
T1 - Biomechanical evaluation of an allograft fixation system for ACL reconstruction
AU - Benca, Emir
AU - van Knegsel, Kenneth P
AU - Zderic, Ivan
AU - Caspar, Jan
AU - Strassl, Andreas
AU - Hirtler, Lena
AU - Fuchssteiner, Christoph
AU - Gueorguiev, Boyko
AU - Windhager, Reinhard
AU - Widhalm, Harald
AU - Varga, Peter
N1 - Copyright © 2022 Benca, van Knegsel, Zderic, Caspar, Strassl, Hirtler, Fuchssteiner, Gueorguiev, Windhager, Widhalm and Varga.
PY - 2022/11/3
Y1 - 2022/11/3
N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability, especially graft slippage of an allograft screw and a conventional interference screw for tibial implant fixation in ACL reconstruction. Twenty-four paired human proximal tibia specimens underwent ACL reconstruction, with the graft in one specimen of each pair fixed using the allograft screw and the other using the conventional interference screw. Specimens were subjected to cyclic tensile loading until failure. The two fixation methods did not show any statistical difference in load at graft slippage (p = 0.241) or estimated mean survival until slippage onset (p = 0.061). The ultimate load and the estimated mean survival until failure were higher for the interference screw (p = 0.04, and p = 0.018, respectively). Graft displacement at ultimate load reached values of up to 7.2 (interference screw) and 11.3 mm (allograft screw). The allograft screw for implant fixation in ACL reconstruction demonstrated comparable behavior in terms of graft slippage to the interference screw but underperformed in terms of ultimate load. However, the ultimate load, occurring at progressive graft slippage, may not be considered a direct indicator of clinical failure.
AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability, especially graft slippage of an allograft screw and a conventional interference screw for tibial implant fixation in ACL reconstruction. Twenty-four paired human proximal tibia specimens underwent ACL reconstruction, with the graft in one specimen of each pair fixed using the allograft screw and the other using the conventional interference screw. Specimens were subjected to cyclic tensile loading until failure. The two fixation methods did not show any statistical difference in load at graft slippage (p = 0.241) or estimated mean survival until slippage onset (p = 0.061). The ultimate load and the estimated mean survival until failure were higher for the interference screw (p = 0.04, and p = 0.018, respectively). Graft displacement at ultimate load reached values of up to 7.2 (interference screw) and 11.3 mm (allograft screw). The allograft screw for implant fixation in ACL reconstruction demonstrated comparable behavior in terms of graft slippage to the interference screw but underperformed in terms of ultimate load. However, the ultimate load, occurring at progressive graft slippage, may not be considered a direct indicator of clinical failure.
U2 - 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1000624
DO - 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1000624
M3 - Article
C2 - 36406221
SN - 2296-4185
VL - 10
JO - Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology
JF - Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology
M1 - 1000624
ER -