Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Biomechanical analysis of helical versus straight plating of proximal third humeral shaft fractures

  • Torsten Pastor*
  • , Ivan Zderic
  • , Kenneth P van Knegsel
  • , Frank J P Beeres
  • , Filippo Migliorini
  • , Reto Babst
  • , Sven Nebelung
  • , Bergita Ganse
  • , Carsten Schoeneberg
  • , Boyko Gueorguiev
  • , Matthias Knobe
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral shaft fractures are surgically challenging and plate osteosynthesis with a long straight plate is one operative treatment option in these patients although endangering the radial nerve distally. Helical plates potentially avoid the radial nerve by twisting around the humeral shaft. Aim of the study was to investigate in a human cadaveric model the biomechanical competence of helical plates versus straight lateral plates used for fixation of proximal third comminuted humeral shaft fractures.

METHODS: Eight pairs of humeral cadaveric humeri were instrumented using either a long 90°-helical plate (Group1) or a straight long PHILOS plate (Group2). An unstable proximal humeral shaft fracture was simulated by means of a 5 cm osteotomy gap. All specimens were tested under quasi-static loading in axial compression, internal and external rotation, and bending in four directions. Subsequently, progressively increasing cyclic loading in internal rotation until failure was applied and interfragmentary movements were monitored by motion tracking.

RESULTS: During static testing flexion/extension deformation in Group1 was significantly higher, however, varus/valgus deformation as well as shear and torsional displacement under torsional load remained statistically indifferent between both groups. During cyclic testing shear and torsional displacements were both significantly higher in Group1 compared to Group 2. However, cycles to catastrophic failure remained statistically indifferent between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS: From a biomechanical perspective, although 90°-helical plating is associated with higher initial stability against varus/valgus collapse and comparable endurance under dynamic loading, it demonstrates lower resistance to flexion/extension and internal rotation with bigger shear interfragmentary displacements versus straight lateral plating and, therefore, cannot be considered as its real alternative. Alternative helical plate designs should be investigated in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4983-4991
Number of pages9
JournalArchives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Volume143
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal
  • Bone Plates
  • Humeral Fractures/surgery
  • Humerus
  • Shoulder Fractures/surgery
  • Cadaver

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biomechanical analysis of helical versus straight plating of proximal third humeral shaft fractures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this