Beyond the deportation regime: differential state interests and capacities in dealing with (non-) deportability in Europe

A. Leerkes*, M. Van Houte

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

There is considerable variation in how countries deal with the presence of migrants lacking a legal right to stay. We present an analysis of the post-arrival migration enforcement regimes of European countries using a two-phased mixed-methods approach. The article (1) provides the currently best possible statistical overview of forced and assisted return in 12 European countries among rejected asylum seekers from six source countries, and (2) explores policy practices in six Western European and Scandinavian countries regarding deportability and effective non-deportability. While most rejected asylum seekers examined do not demonstrably return, we see highly divergent return patterns between host countries, and significant policy differences. The article thus shows the importance of better examining variation in post-arrival enforcement policies and their underlying interests and capacities. There is not one unified 'deportation regime'; there are at least four ideal-typical 'post-arrival enforcement regimes': thin, thick, targeted, and hampered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-338
Number of pages20
JournalCitizenship Studies
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2020

JEL classifications

  • o15 - "Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration"

Keywords

  • Europe
  • European Union
  • Immigration regimes
  • deportation
  • globalisation
  • immigrant population
  • immigration policy
  • institutional framework
  • institutional logics
  • migrants experience
  • migration
  • IMMIGRANTS
  • DETENTION
  • MIGRATION CONTROL
  • EXCLUSION
  • POLICY
  • BORDER
  • INTEGRATION
  • ASYLUM
  • ENFORCEMENT

Cite this