Betrokken vertwijfeling: Een intersectionele analyse van partnergeweld in de huisartsenpraktijk

Eva Vergaert*, Sophie Withaeckx, Gily Coene

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is a major societal problem with significant healthcare implications. The consequences of this kind of violence result in victims (and perpetrators) regularly needing healthcare. Various structural barriers can prevent victims from accessing services or result in inadequate responses to their needs. International research shows that general practitioners can play an important role in tackling IPV but that they also are confronted with various difficulties themselves. Drawing on seventeen in-depth interviews with general practitioners in Flanders, we discuss in this article the experiences of GPs who come across IPV in their health care practice. We use an intersectional approach to better understand the difficulties GPs face by looking at the complexity underlying these cases and by exploring GPs’ understanding of vulnerabilities of marginalised groups. A thematic data analysis was applied. Using a number of case studies, we found that GPs are confronted with various structural barriers that complicate the care of patients who are victims of IPV. This gives rise to alternative care strategies, which are based on a sentiment of ‘involved incertitude’.
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)197-221
JournalTijdschrift voor Genderstudies
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2021

Keywords

  • public health
  • general practice care
  • Intersectionality
  • intimate partner violence

Cite this