Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Benchmarking of shotgun sequencing depth reveals the potential and limitations of shallow metagenomics and strain-level analysis

  • Nicole S. Treichel*
  • , Charlie Pauvert
  • , Joana Seneca
  • , Petra Pjevac
  • , David Berry
  • , John Penders
  • , Thomas C. A. Hitch
  • , Thomas Clavel*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Shotgun metagenomics can provide both taxonomic and functional insights, but benchmarking is necessary to determine the sequencing depth appropriate for specific analyses. Here we used complex mixtures of DNA from cultured bacteria and analysed taxonomic composition, strain-level resolution and functional profiles at up to 11 sequencing depths (0.1-50.0 Gb). Reference-based analysis provided accurate strain-level taxonomy at 0.5-1.0 Gb. By contrast, de novo metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) reconstruction required deep sequencing (>10 Gb), and even MAGs deemed high quality by standard metrics were chimeric, with 54.5-81.8% accurately representing original strains, depending on the bioinformatic approach. Functionally, 2 Gb provided reliable insights at the pathway level for each of the mock communities tested, but sufficient proteome coverage was achieved only at or above 10 Gb. Library preparation and host DNA contamination were identified as confounders in shallow metagenomic analysis. This analysis highlights the potential and limitations of shallow metagenomics and provides guidance to accurately capture strain-level diversity using MAGs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1233-1244
Number of pages12
JournalNature Microbiology
Volume11
Issue number5
Early online date1 Apr 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2026

Keywords

  • ALIGNMENT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Benchmarking of shotgun sequencing depth reveals the potential and limitations of shallow metagenomics and strain-level analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this