Abstract
In the past decades, behavioral economics has become an influential and important field of economics. Interest in behavioral economics derives from unease with standard economic models that are based on restrictive assumptions, which confine the nature of human motivation. Although Adam Smith, the founding father of modern economics, had highlighted the multitude of psychological motives that drive human behavior, and despite the fact that many influential economists thereafter believed in tenets of modern behavioral economics, the homo economicus assumption became prevalent, until this construct was challenged by compelling evidence on social, cognitive and emotional factors that drive decision-making and social interaction. Since human interaction is germane to labor markets, one would expect behavioral economics to be highly relevant for labor economics. This paper gauges whether and how behavioral economics has left its mark on labor economics, considers the timing and structure of this development, and contemplates its future impact on labor economics.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 71-85 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Labour Economics |
Volume | 30 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2014 |
Keywords
- REFERENCE-DEPENDENT PREFERENCES
- PUBLIC-GOODS EXPERIMENTS
- WAGE-EFFORT HYPOTHESIS
- YORK-CITY CABDRIVERS
- POSITIVE SELF-IMAGE
- FIELD EXPERIMENT
- RISK-AVERSION
- SOCIAL PREFERENCES
- GIFT EXCHANGE
- JOB SEARCH