Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is known to worsen over time. Beat-to-beat P-wave variability is used to evaluate the risk of developing AF, but it has not been used to monitor arrhythmia progression in a comprehensive model. The aim of this study is to create a method to measure beat-to-beat P-wave variability to evaluate AF types. ECG recordings of 5 minutes were measured on 159 AF patients. The first three principal components (PCs) of the ECG signal were added to the analysis. The temporal beat-to-beat P-wave variability was assessed through the normalized Euclidean Distance and the Similarity Index. The spatial P-wave similarity was measured as the percentage of variance explained by the first 2 PCs. A binomial logistic regression model was built for each lead and parameter, with AF type as dependent variable. To assess variability due exclusively to the P-waves, we considered, as confounding factors, other sources of ECG-variability, such as the noise level, the variability of the RR series and of the heart axis. Both temporal (e.g. 0.94±0.12 for paroxysmal AF and 0.85±0.28 for persistent AF in lead I, p=0.001) and spatial P-wave similarities (95.35±3.29% for paroxysmal AF vs 94.44±4.14% for persistent AF, p=0.001) were significantly higher in paroxysmal than in persistent AF, suggesting them as promising tools to evaluate AF types.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 2020 Computing in Cardiology |
Publisher | IEEE Xplore |
Pages | 1-4 |
Number of pages | 4 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781728173825 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-7281-1105-6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 16 Sept 2020 |
Event | 2020 Computing in Cardiology - Rimini, Italy Duration: 13 Sept 2020 → 16 Sept 2020 |
Conference
Conference | 2020 Computing in Cardiology |
---|---|
Period | 13/09/20 → 16/09/20 |
Keywords
- Atrial fibrillation
- Lead
- Tools
- Indexes
- Monitoring
- Noise level
- Logistics