BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE MODELS: ACCEPTANCE-REJECTION WITHIN DIRECT MONTE CARLO

Arnold Zellner, Tomohiro Ando, Nalan Basturk, Lennart Hoogerheide*, Herman K. van Dijk

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    12 Citations (Web of Science)

    Abstract

    We discuss bayesian inferential procedures within the family of instrumental variables regression models and focus on two issues: existence conditions for posterior moments of the parameters of interest under a flat prior and the potential of direct monte carlo (dmc) approaches for efficient evaluation of such possibly highly non-elliptical posteriors. We show that, for the general case of m endogenous variables under a flat prior, posterior moments of order r exist for the coefficients reflecting the endogenous regressors’ effect on the dependent variable, if the number of instruments is greater than m +r, even though there is an issue of local non-identification that causes non-elliptical shapes of the posterior. This stresses the need for efficient monte carlo integration methods. We introduce an extension of dmc that incorporates an acceptance-rejection sampling step within dmc. This acceptance-rejection within direct monte carlo (ardmc) method has the attractive property that the generated random drawings are independent, which greatly helps the fast convergence of simulation results, and which facilitates the evaluation of the numerical accuracy. The speed of ardmc can be easily further improved by making use of parallelized computation using multiple core machines or computer clusters. We note that ardmc is an analogue to the well-known “metropolis-hastings within gibbs” sampling in the sense that one ‘more difficult’ step is used within an ‘easier’ simulation method. We compare the ardmc approach with the gibbs sampler using simulated data and two empirical data sets, involving the settler mortality instrument of acemoglu et al. (2001 acemoglu , d. Johnson , s. Robinson , j. A. ( 2001 ). The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation . American economic review 91 ( 5 ): 1369 – 1401 .[crossref], [web of science ®], , [google scholar]) and father's education's instrument used by hoogerheide et al. (2012a hoogerheide , l. F. Block , j. H. Thurik , a. R. (2012a). Family background variables as instruments for education in income regressions: a bayesian analysis. Economics of education review 31(5):515–523.[crossref], [web of science ®], , [google scholar]). Even without making use of parallelized computation, an efficiency gain is observed both under strong and weak instruments, where the gain can be enormous in the latter case.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3-35
    JournalEconometric Reviews
    Volume33
    Issue number1-4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 10 Feb 2014

    JEL classifications

    • c11 - Bayesian Analysis: General
    • c15 - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
    • c26 - Single Equation Models: Single Variables: Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation
    • c36 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models: Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation

    Keywords

    • Acceptance-Rejection
    • Bayesian inference
    • Direct Monte Carlo
    • Instrumental variables
    • Numerical standard errors

    Cite this