Autologous Transplantation Versus Allogeneic Transplantation in Patients With Follicular Lymphoma Experiencing Early Treatment Failure

  • S.M. Smith
  • , J. Godfrey
  • , K.W. Ahn
  • , A. DiGilio
  • , S. Ahmed
  • , V. Agrawal
  • , V. Bachanova
  • , U. Bacher
  • , A. Bashey
  • , J. Bolanos-Meade
  • , M. Cairo
  • , A. Chen
  • , S. Chhabra
  • , E. Copelan
  • , P.B. Dahi
  • , M. Aljurf
  • , U. Farooq
  • , S. Ganguly
  • , M. Hertzberg
  • , L. Holmberg
  • D. Inwards, A.S. Kanate, R. Karmali, V.P. Kenkre, M.A. Kharfan-Dabaja, A. Klein, H.M. Lazarus, M. Mei, A. Mussetti, T. Nishihori, P.R. Geethakumari, A. Saad, B.N. Savani, H.C. Schouten, N. Shah, A. Urbano-Ispizua, R. Vij, J. Vose, A. Sureda, M. Hamadani*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early treatment failure (ETF) in follicular lymphoma (FL), defined as relapse or progression within 2 years of frontline chemoimmunotherapy, is a newly recognized marker of poor survival and identifies a high-risk group of patients with an expected 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of approximately 50%. Transplantation is an established option for relapsed FL, but its efficacy in this specific ETF FL population has not been previously evaluated. METHODS: This study compared autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) with either matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) as the first transplantation approach for patients with ETF FL (age >= 18 years) undergoing auto-HCT or allo-HCT between 2002 and 2014. The primary endpoint was OS. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, relapse, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). RESULTS: Four hundred forty FL patients had ETF (auto-HCT, 240; MSD hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [HCT], 105; and MUD HCT, 95). With a median follow-up of 69 to 73 months, the adjusted probability of 5-year OS was significantly higher after auto-HCT (70%) or MSD HCT (73%) versus MUD HCT (49%; P=.0008). The 5-year adjusted probability of NRM was significantly lower for auto-HCT (5%) versus MSD (17%) or MUD HCT (33%; P<.0001). The 5-year adjusted probability of disease relapse was lower with MSD (31%) or MUD HCT (23%) versus auto-HCT (58%; P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high-risk FL, as defined by ETF, undergoing auto-HCT for FL have low NRM and a promising 5-year OS rate (70%). MSD HCT has lower relapse rates than auto-HCT but similar OS. (C) 2018 American Cancer Society.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2541-2551
Number of pages11
JournalCancer
Volume124
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2018

Keywords

  • allogeneic transplantation
  • autologous transplantation
  • chemoimmunotherapy
  • early treatment failure
  • follicular lymphoma
  • rituximab
  • STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION
  • TERM-FOLLOW-UP
  • EARLY RELAPSE
  • HIGH-RISK
  • SURVIVAL
  • RITUXIMAB
  • GRADE
  • IDELALISIB
  • REMISSION
  • OUTCOMES

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Autologous Transplantation Versus Allogeneic Transplantation in Patients With Follicular Lymphoma Experiencing Early Treatment Failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this