Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Autistic injustice as affective injustice: the double empathy problem is not about empathy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that autistic individuals experience a specific kind of injustice: autistic injustice. I will argue that this form of injustice is closely tied to emotional norms, which are the standards dictating, for instance, how emotions should be expressed appropriately and which emotions are deemed suitable in particular contexts. I will build on Damian Milton's (2012) concept of the "Double Empathy Problem," which challenges the traditional view that autistic people lack empathy. However, I propose that Milton's focus on individual psychology could complement a structural account that centers on emotional norms. My argument is that these emotional norms, which govern most of our social interactions, are predominantly designed to meet neurotypical needs and expectations, often disregarding the needs and preferences of autistic individuals. This, I argue, constitutes an affective injustice.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages19
JournalPhilosophical Psychology
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 31 Mar 2026

Keywords

  • Autism
  • neurodiversity
  • double empathy problem
  • affective injustice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Autistic injustice as affective injustice: the double empathy problem is not about empathy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this