Authors should consider reviewer comments on a rejected article to improve their article before submission to the next journal

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	830-831
Number of pages	2
Journal	Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume	67
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.012
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2014

Access to Document

@article{06fc8aaa680a44ba8e1fb53a4509317e,

title = "Authors should consider reviewer comments on a rejected article to improve their article before submission to the next journal",

author = "D. Kotz and J.W.L. Cals",

year = "2014",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.012",

language = "English",

volume = "67",

pages = "830--831",

journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",

issn = "0895-4356",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Authors should consider reviewer comments on a rejected article to improve their article before submission to the next journal

AU - Kotz, D.

AU - Cals, J.W.L.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.012

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

SN - 0895-4356

VL - 67

SP - 830

EP - 831

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

IS - 7

ER -