Authors' reply re: Universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis: Universal screening versus risk-based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Reply

Geke Hasperhoven; Salwan Al-Nasiry; Vincent Bekker; Eduardo Villamor; Boris Kramer

doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16297

Authors' reply re: Universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis: Universal screening versus risk-based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Reply

Geke Hasperhoven^*, Salwan Al-Nasiry, Vincent Bekker, Eduardo Villamor, Boris Kramer

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1168-1169
Number of pages	2
Journal	Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume	127
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16297
Publication status	Published - Aug 2020

Access to Document

10.1111/1471-0528.16297

Cite this

Hasperhoven, G., Al-Nasiry, S., Bekker, V., Villamor, E., & Kramer, B. (2020). Authors' reply re: Universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis: Universal screening versus risk-based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Reply. Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 127(9), 1168-1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16297

Hasperhoven, Geke ; Al-Nasiry, Salwan ; Bekker, Vincent et al. / Authors' reply re: Universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis : Universal screening versus risk-based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Reply. In: Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2020 ; Vol. 127, No. 9. pp. 1168-1169.

@article{b68f915cceb0426ca6c0ae3195345a05,

title = "Authors' reply re: Universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis: Universal screening versus risk-based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Reply",

author = "Geke Hasperhoven and Salwan Al-Nasiry and Vincent Bekker and Eduardo Villamor and Boris Kramer",

year = "2020",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1111/1471-0528.16297",

language = "English",

volume = "127",

pages = "1168--1169",

journal = "Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",

issn = "1470-0328",

publisher = "John Wiley \& Sons Inc.",

number = "9",

}

Hasperhoven, G, Al-Nasiry, S, Bekker, V, Villamor, E & Kramer, B 2020, 'Authors' reply re: Universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis: Universal screening versus risk-based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Reply', Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 127, no. 9, pp. 1168-1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16297

Authors' reply re: Universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis: Universal screening versus risk-based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Reply. / Hasperhoven, Geke; Al-Nasiry, Salwan; Bekker, Vincent et al.
In: Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 127, No. 9, 08.2020, p. 1168-1169.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Authors' reply re: Universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

T2 - Universal screening versus risk-based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Reply

AU - Hasperhoven, Geke

AU - Al-Nasiry, Salwan

AU - Bekker, Vincent

AU - Villamor, Eduardo

AU - Kramer, Boris

PY - 2020/8

Y1 - 2020/8

U2 - 10.1111/1471-0528.16297

DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.16297

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 32537820

SN - 1470-0328

VL - 127

SP - 1168

EP - 1169

JO - Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

IS - 9

ER -

Hasperhoven G, Al-Nasiry S, Bekker V, Villamor E, Kramer B. Authors' reply re: Universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis: Universal screening versus risk-based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Reply. Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2020 Aug;127(9):1168-1169. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16297