Authors' reply re: Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial)

M. van Ijsselmuiden; A. van Oudheusden; J. Veen; G. van de Pol; A. Vollebregt; C. Radder; S. Housmans; S. van Kuijk; J. Deprest; M. Bongers; H. van Eijndhoven

doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16640

Authors' reply re: Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial)

M. van Ijsselmuiden^*
, A. van Oudheusden
, J. Veen
, G. van de Pol
, A. Vollebregt
, C. Radder
, S. Housmans
, S. van Kuijk
, J. Deprest
, M. Bongers
, H. van Eijndhoven

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	939-940
Number of pages	2
Journal	Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume	128
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16640
Publication status	Published - 1 Apr 2021

Keywords

surgery
SURGERY

Access to Document

10.1111/1471-0528.16640

Cite this

van Ijsselmuiden, M., van Oudheusden, A., Veen, J., van de Pol, G., Vollebregt, A., Radder, C., Housmans, S., van Kuijk, S., Deprest, J., Bongers, M., & van Eijndhoven, H. (2021). Authors' reply re: Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial). Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 128(5), 939-940. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16640

@article{b8729db0153a4c1c82975e962c6372d9,

title = "Authors' reply re: Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial)",

keywords = "surgery, SURGERY",

author = "\{van Ijsselmuiden\}, M. and \{van Oudheusden\}, A. and J. Veen and \{van de Pol\}, G. and A. Vollebregt and C. Radder and S. Housmans and \{van Kuijk\}, S. and J. Deprest and M. Bongers and \{van Eijndhoven\}, H.",

year = "2021",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/1471-0528.16640",

language = "English",

volume = "128",

pages = "939--940",

journal = "Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",

issn = "1470-0328",

publisher = "John Wiley \& Sons Inc.",

number = "5",

}

van Ijsselmuiden, M, van Oudheusden, A, Veen, J, van de Pol, G, Vollebregt, A, Radder, C, Housmans, S, van Kuijk, S, Deprest, J, Bongers, M & van Eijndhoven, H 2021, 'Authors' reply re: Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial)', Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 939-940. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16640

Authors' reply re: Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial). / van Ijsselmuiden, M.; van Oudheusden, A.; Veen, J. et al.
In: Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 128, No. 5, 01.04.2021, p. 939-940.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Authors' reply re: Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial)

AU - van Ijsselmuiden, M.

AU - van Oudheusden, A.

AU - Veen, J.

AU - van de Pol, G.

AU - Vollebregt, A.

AU - Radder, C.

AU - Housmans, S.

AU - van Kuijk, S.

AU - Deprest, J.

AU - Bongers, M.

AU - van Eijndhoven, H.

PY - 2021/4/1

Y1 - 2021/4/1

KW - surgery

KW - SURGERY

U2 - 10.1111/1471-0528.16640

DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.16640

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 33550670

SN - 1470-0328

VL - 128

SP - 939

EP - 940

JO - Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

IS - 5

ER -

van Ijsselmuiden M, van Oudheusden A, Veen J, van de Pol G, Vollebregt A, Radder C et al. Authors' reply re: Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial). Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2021 Apr 1;128(5):939-940. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16640