Auditory change detection in fragile X syndrome males: A brain potential study

M. J. W. Van der Molen*, M. W. Van der Molen, K. R. Ridderinkhof, B. C. J. Hamel, L. M. G. Curfs, G. J. A. Ramakers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: The present study investigated involuntary change detection in a two-tone pre-attentive auditory discrimination paradigm in order to better understand the information processing mechanisms underlying attention deficits in fragile X syndrome (FXS) males. Methods: Sixteen males with the FXS full mutation and 20 age-matched control participants (mean age 29 years) were presented with series of auditory stimuli consisting of standard and deviant tones while watching a silent movie. Results: Brain potentials recorded to the tones showed that N1 and P2, sensory evoked potentials, were significantly enhanced in FXS compared to age-matched control participants. In contrast to controls, the N1 to standard tones failed to show long-term habituation to stimulus repetition in FXS. Additionally, both mismatch negativity and P3a generation, reflecting automatic change detection and the involuntary switch of attention, respectively, were significantly attenuated in FXS males. Conclusions: The current study demonstrates that auditory stimulus discrimination in the FXS brain is already compromised during the pre-attentive stages of information processing. Furthermore, the apparent pre-attentive information processing deficiencies in FXS coincide with a weakness in the involuntary engagement of attentional resources. Significance: The stimulus-driven information processing deficiencies in FXS might compromise information processing in several domains and, thus, present a key-deficit in FXS neurocognition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1309-1318
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume123
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2012

Keywords

  • Fragile X syndrome
  • Event-related potentials
  • Mismatch negativity
  • Auditory
  • Attention

Cite this