Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Audit Partner Trait Skepticism and Going-Concern Reporting Decisions

  • Kris Hardies*
  • , Sanne Janssen
  • , Ann Vanstraelen
  • , Karla M. Zehms
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between audit partners' trait skepticism and their skeptical actions in the form of going-concern (GC) reporting decisions for financially distressed client companies. We use a unique research design whereby we link a psychometric measurement of partner trait skepticism with publicly available data on companies' characteristics and audit opinions. Our main results reveal a positive association between partners' trait skepticism and their skeptical actions (the likelihood they issue GC opinions to financially distressed clients). In supplemental analyses, we investigate nuances of this association with respect to both partner competence and independence. We find that partners' competence and independence moderate the relationship between trait skepticism and skeptical actions, in that competence and independence help auditors to act on their skeptical disposition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-92
Number of pages20
JournalAuditing-a Journal of Practice & Theory
Volume45
Issue number2
Early online date1 Aug 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2026

Keywords

  • professional skepticism
  • trait skepticism
  • going-concern
  • Hurtt scale
  • partner expertise
  • audit partner portfolio size
  • GOING-CONCERN UNCERTAINTY
  • PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM
  • QUALITY INSIGHTS
  • EXPERIENCE
  • PERSONALITY
  • JUDGMENTS
  • BEHAVIOR
  • OUTCOMES
  • TENURE
  • BIASES

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Audit Partner Trait Skepticism and Going-Concern Reporting Decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this