Abstract
We investigate the relationship between audit partners' trait skepticism and their skeptical actions in the form of going-concern (GC) reporting decisions for financially distressed client companies. We use a unique research design whereby we link a psychometric measurement of partner trait skepticism with publicly available data on companies' characteristics and audit opinions. Our main results reveal a positive association between partners' trait skepticism and their skeptical actions (the likelihood they issue GC opinions to financially distressed clients). In supplemental analyses, we investigate nuances of this association with respect to both partner competence and independence. We find that partners' competence and independence moderate the relationship between trait skepticism and skeptical actions, in that competence and independence help auditors to act on their skeptical disposition.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 73-92 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Auditing-a Journal of Practice & Theory |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 1 Aug 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2026 |
Keywords
- professional skepticism
- trait skepticism
- going-concern
- Hurtt scale
- partner expertise
- audit partner portfolio size
- GOING-CONCERN UNCERTAINTY
- PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM
- QUALITY INSIGHTS
- EXPERIENCE
- PERSONALITY
- JUDGMENTS
- BEHAVIOR
- OUTCOMES
- TENURE
- BIASES
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Audit Partner Trait Skepticism and Going-Concern Reporting Decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver